insurance is a business. they make an offer, you haggle a bit, and you eventually end up wiping your chin and walking away.
write off payouts are basically them purchasing your bike based on its value pre collision, they then own it, and can opt to offer to sell you the wreck if they want.
No court in the country is going to award you 7k for something worth 2k.
So you can either take the offer and walk away, OR say no, keep your bike and end up with nothing.
To be fair, he makes a good point, one that you will absolutely need to accept and run with if you plan to get anywhere. Get some pre accident valuations done by reputable bike shows, troll TradeMe for similar vehicles, whatever.
Without being able to demonstrate to the adjudicator at the Disputes Tribunal (for that's where you're going to end up) that it's worth what you claim you're basically fucked.
I know where you're coming from... my SV owes me a lot more than I will ever get for it if I'm put in your situation. I've mitigated that risk slightly by getting it valued and insurance agreed to that value, but I'd still be out of pocket if I place a claim and accept that value. My only other recourse in your situation would be exactly the same as you, valuations in hand and off to the Disputes Tribunal.
Shit situation, but that's the deal with modified vehicles. Ghey, but HTH.
But ok I'll bite. The value of the repair will be well known as his insurance company will of received 2 or 3 quotes to get this done when they "write off" my bike. That value is the amount of damage done to my bike.
Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot
Im not wanting 7k, I'm wanting the bike repaired to pre-accident condition, and the bill sent to who ever has to pay it.
And by god, if any one crashed into me, then tired to buy my bike, i'd tell them to shooooove it. Damage my bike, then take it off me? You've got to be kidding.
Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Unbelieveable. Did either of the two previous posters read the thread?
1. RM isn't talking about making a claim - he is the uninsured (but not at fault) party.
2. The insurance co representing the other party has no power to 'write off' RM's bike - the insurance company simply has to pay for the damage done by their client surely.
The other party however is obliged (if they are found to be at fault) to compensate the $2000 bike with the $5000 worth of mods (as they are responsible for that damage).....Yes....?
This is KB Kindergarten. It provides me with so much entertainment.
Actually not Yes but NO. Just because someone sunk a whole lot of cash into a black hole - bike, boat, bach, other loss making investments! doesn't make it worth the total spent. A legal test that will be applied is the "Reasonable Person" test; ie what would a reasonable person determine was appropriate. Market value is pretty much the test that a reasonable person would consider fair.
Here for the ride.
He doesn't have a market value contract with an insurance company (though the at fault party might).
He wants the bike rebuilt to spec - not a pay out. ie: Strip the broken bits, straighten said bike out or replace with OEM parts, and replace the aftermarket goodies Harris pipe, Ohlins shock, rizoma rear sets etc etc etc
FFS it's not that hard is it?
Mr Heads insurer cannot write off what they have no legal claim to... Mr Head is obliged to cover costs incurred as he is the at fault party...If Mr Head wants to claim via his insurance company that is for him to consider...no?
I would love to see some authoritive posts from insurers on this subject, (I know you are watching) ....because taking this another step...
What would happen if both parties were insured, but the bikes owner knowss if he hands the matter to his own insurer to claim, they can then (contractually between them and the bike owner) be able to force a "market value" settlement on the bike owner, who is victim of anothers fault. In which case, he may choose not notify his insurer, but opts instead to persue compensation for the bikes "improved" value which may be above the market value...although there would be some effort involved to substantiate the improved value.
Can of worms this one, IMO
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks