Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 87

Thread: HD has finally sorted the water cooling issue

  1. #16
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    Thats because AMF motorcycles (aka KAWASAKI) sorted out the evo engine just before it was sold back to HD
    Hate to tell you this too mate...but an Evo is simply an aluminium top end on a Shovel, it was hardly a new engine. The twin cam is the first really new engine from HD in a very long time. It's a goodin too.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 18:09
    Bike
    CB750
    Location
    dunners
    Posts
    745
    When HD went broke in the early 80's, it was purchased by kawasaki heavy industries through AMF, which at the time was actually owned by kawasaki heavy industries.HD was developing the evo engine but could not make it reliable.Kawasaki input through AMF motorcycles engineered the evo to make it work.Then the president of USA at the time Ronald Regan said its not on for the japs to own such an iconic american company, and a deal was struck to buy it back, with the new evo engine design of course, and the rest is history.............well a bit of history that most HD blokes deny.(dont get sore about, look how it changed HD)

  3. #18
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 18:09
    Bike
    CB750
    Location
    dunners
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Hate to tell you this too mate...but an Evo is simply an aluminium top end on a Shovel, it was hardly a new engine. The twin cam is the first really new engine from HD in a very long time. It's a goodin too.
    Yep as I said, HD could not make it reliable.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    When HD when broke in the early 80's, it was purchased by kawasaki heavy industries through AMF, which at the time was actually owned by kawasaki heavy industries.HD was developing the evo engine but could not make it reliable.Kawasaki input through AMF motorcycles engineered the evo to make it work.Then the president of USA at the time Ronald Regan said its not on for the japs to own such an iconic american company, and a deal was struck to buy it back, with the new evo engine design of course, and the rest is history.............well a bit of history that most HD blokes deny.
    HD broke in 60's.......then bought and owned, and run buy AMF (which have nothing to do with KHI....and never have). Many people did not like the way AMF ran things because the bikes stayed the same and all they did was cut the work force.
    HD was sold back to this workers/investors in 81.
    Reagan did not save Harley by getting "it off the japs". He saved it by slapping 45% tax on all jap bikes over 700cc. Thus killing their competition. In 1983.....after it was owned by the worker/investors who took over in 81.

    What next? your going to say the Area 51 crashed ship was Fuji Heavy Industries. Please check your history books before doing this again.
    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    When HD went broke in the early 80's, it was purchased by kawasaki heavy industries through AMF, which at the time was actually owned by kawasaki heavy industries.HD was developing the evo engine but could not make it reliable.Kawasaki input through AMF motorcycles engineered the evo to make it work.Then the president of USA at the time Ronald Regan said its not on for the japs to own such an iconic american company, and a deal was struck to buy it back, with the new evo engine design of course, and the rest is history.............well a bit of history that most HD blokes deny.(dont get sore about, look how it changed HD)
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    Yep as I said, HD could not make it reliable.
    You're kidding yourself.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 18:09
    Bike
    CB750
    Location
    dunners
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    HD broke in 60's.......then bought and owned, and run buy AMF (which have nothing to do with KHI....and never have). Many people did not like the way AMF ran things because the bikes stayed the same and all they did was cut the work force.
    HD was sold back to this workers/investors in 81.
    Reagan did not save Harley by getting "it off the japs". He saved it by slapping 45% tax on all jap bikes over 700cc. Thus killing their competition. In 1983.....after it was owned by the worker/investors who took over in 81.

    What next? your going to say the Area 51 crashed ship was Fuji Heavy Industries. Please check your history books before doing this again.
    This is how most people react, but its how it happened.Just in case you do not understand, KHI purchased AMF motorcycles for a very brief time, just enough to fully develop the evo engine,( it was only a few months) before a deal was brokered which involved the input from the US government(keeping jobs etc).(KHI got it for peanuts, but sold it back for a fortune).Take it as you like,but as I said most HD buffs dont like to admit it.

    Area 51 crashed ship? you've been watching to much TV!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 16:54
    Bike
    2012 Victory Highball
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    817
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    This is how most people react, but its how it happened.Just in case you do not understand, KHI purchased AMF motorcycles for a very brief time, just enough to fully develop the evo engine,( it was only a few months) before a deal was brokered which involved the input from the US government(keeping jobs etc).(KHI got it for peanuts, but sold it back for a fortune).Take it as you like,but as I said most HD buffs dont like to admit it.

    Is there some sort of supporting evidence for this?
    Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet

  8. #23
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by AD345 View Post
    Is there some sort of supporting evidence for this?
    Nope ....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America...ne_and_Foundry
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  9. #24
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 16:54
    Bike
    2012 Victory Highball
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    817
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    That's what I thought
    Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet

  10. #25
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by AD345 View Post
    That's what I thought
    Might just be a secret ....

    interesting reading here ...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harley-..._Motor_Company
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  11. #26
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    When HD went broke in the early 80's, it was purchased by kawasaki heavy industries through AMF, which at the time was actually owned by kawasaki heavy industries.HD was developing the evo engine but could not make it reliable.Kawasaki input through AMF motorcycles engineered the evo to make it work.Then the president of USA at the time Ronald Regan said its not on for the japs to own such an iconic american company, and a deal was struck to buy it back, with the new evo engine design of course, and the rest is history.............well a bit of history that most HD blokes deny.(dont get sore about, look how it changed HD)
    Troll???

    Or?????
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  12. #27
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    Area 51 crashed ship? you've been watching to much TV!
    Seems to be more reliable a source than where ever you get your info from.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by bsasuper View Post
    This is how most people react, but its how it happened.Just in case you do not understand, KHI purchased AMF motorcycles for a very brief time, just enough to fully develop the evo engine,( it was only a few months) before a deal was brokered which involved the input from the US government(keeping jobs etc).(KHI got it for peanuts, but sold it back for a fortune).Take it as you like,but as I said most HD buffs dont like to admit it.
    Just to keep helping you dig the hole.
    If this really did happen. Then why did Harley turn down advice, input and support from the Japanese manufactures in the 80's?
    Also if there was a buddy relationship, Why was parts outsourcing (in the 90's) put to South America and China rather than Japan as ever other American company did?
    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    20th March 2006 - 22:22
    Bike
    ducati 900ss Harley XLCR café racer
    Location
    planet earth
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Hate to tell you this too mate...but an Evo is simply an aluminium top end on a Shovel, it was hardly a new engine. The twin cam is the first really new engine from HD in a very long time. It's a goodin too.
    the evo was a lot more than a redesigned top end, it was a great step forward in quality control

    as for the twin cam being a good engine, harley have made many changes to it over the years, the first of them were complete dogs that sheared off the bolts holding the cam gear arrangement in place

    twin cam is also a disposable motor, chankshaft is not rebuildable and is a throw away item, the larger 110" motors twist the cranks, cam followers rundirect in the blocks so when these wear out the cases are scrap (I beleive the aftermarket have come up with oversize followers)

    the 96 twin cam was alsmost a complete redesign of the 88"

    one of the main problems with the twin cam was they went from drawing board to production in under 12 months, by comparison the evo was road tested for 2 years (the flt and fxr frames were designed for evo motors and were an inch or two taller than required for shovel motors because the evo motor was already in design stage)

    the twin cam has been around for 12 years and had numerous changes, the evo had very few this speaks volumes about which was the better engine

  15. #30
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by popelli View Post
    as for the twin cam being a good engine, harley have made many changes to it over the years, the first of them were complete dogs that sheared off the bolts holding the cam gear arrangement in place

    twin cam is also a disposable motor, chankshaft is not rebuildable and is a throw away item, the larger 110" motors twist the cranks, cam followers rundirect in the blocks so when these wear out the cases are scrap (I beleive the aftermarket have come up with oversize followers)

    the 96 twin cam was alsmost a complete redesign of the 88"

    one of the main problems with the twin cam was they went from drawing board to production in under 12 months, by comparison the evo was road tested for 2 years (the flt and fxr frames were designed for evo motors and were an inch or two taller than required for shovel motors because the evo motor was already in design stage)

    the twin cam has been around for 12 years and had numerous changes, the evo had very few this speaks volumes about which was the better engine
    Hate to tell you this...but you're talking utter shit.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •