You nutbars will like this. http://www.bikeexif.com/honda-cr500#ixzz1l5TQCsls
Licence wouldn't last long I recon
I think with the 2t / 4t debate there are a couple of important points re which is faster
Assuming you're not just wanting to be a straight line warrior..
1. As the weight goes over a point it becomes much less manageable no matter how much more power you're getting.
2. As the engine gets bigger it requires a bigger frame to accommodate it which can also make it harder to ride.
For the 2T fans, IMO the 450 is round about optimum size for 4T for a pro racer (probably closer to 350 for an amateur), being as much power as possible without a weight that's too hard to handle, what would the optimum size cc 2T be (existing measures or otherwise)?
Smoke 'em if you have 'em
You run what you brung, and pray you brought enough
At the height of the 500 MX GP's in the mid 80's a factory 500 would make 65+ horse power , very few riders were capable of riding these monsters to there limits, Joel Smets 570 KTM wud produce similar power same prob not many could ride it esp a 40 min moto.
Yes Crasher the term Rock Ape cud apply to the riders of those mighty 500's , the likes of Caroli etc wud just be a flag hanging on to one. Bobrashev and a few of the Belgium riders wud b of similar build to those Gp heroes.
Carlquist was the ultimate rock ape he just beat the bike and track into submission.
I remember reading and hearing stories about the huge rocks and crap that the old 500s would chew up and spit out over any poor sap silly enough to follow one closely. Apparently racing them was as much as about being able to handle being beaten up by the roost of the guy in front as much as handling the bike...
HOW DARE YOU SAY I HAVE A BIG PIPE
Sometimes I ride Slow, sometimes I Ride Quick, But When its Time To Get Busy Out The Hat Comes The Trick.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks