TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
I fail to see why the French will head down the gurgler as we move into another boom... even with a socialist govt at the helm.
Governments everywhere are struggling with crippling debt because they're BAU governments, no more, no less and as such that includes state handouts. What's the alternative to state handouts? other than homelessness, poverty, hunger and death? Or is that ok? As I've said before and will say again, the country requires a percentage of its population to be unemployed in order to help keep inflation in check and by default yours and my money worth what it's worth (which is less and less these days). Working harder does not add more money to my salary and is not a "remedy" for increasing my bottom line (unless my employer decides to value my contribution, which is definitely not a given). May I suggest that you write to JK and ask him to stop digging such great holes then... much bigger under the current govt than at any time in NZ's history I believe.
As or Brown, he committed the cardinal sin and wanted to further regulate the banks and as it turned out they didn't like the idea much and the country suffered. I'm not saying that was his only "failure", but it really really didn't help matters. As you mention no country is immune, so where is the money going?
The state does owe people a living, in some form or other, especially where there is no work for them or indeed they have worked their entire lives and need to be looked after (shame the pension/super goes less far each year)... after all there's a small number of people who refuse to work (I get closer and closer to wanting to join them by the day) and that's fine by me if a percentage of the country are required to be unemployed (inflation). So why gripe about them when there's nothing that can be done about that? As far as the other end of the scale goes, close every tax loophole that is available (incentive my arse). There are plenty and those in govt no doubt know exactly what they are.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
From the age of 15 I thought I was investing in my current (retired) situation through my "contribution" to the countries taxation system for over 40 years!
I would gladly suffer a reduction in my pension to support the education of our youth, if I could be sure that that is where it would actually go to!
IMHO investment in our youth (our future) is a higher return on investment than is the investment in our elderly (the past) if there needed to be a choice made!
On the other hand do any of you believe that the current situation has arisen as a result of "prudent" management of our countries financial resources?
As you can quite clearly see, if there needs to be choice made to correct the anomaly, it is clearly a choice to change the people and systems that have caused it!
Like tidying your garage, it is no use shifting the shit from side to side and declaring a good job well done!
You have to actually "throw the shit out" and put only the stuff that "works for you" in the place that the shit used to occupy!
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome is just plain pure fucking stupidity!![]()
"Social debt" (current system) does not deliver anything except stifling and crippling debt, the world is basking in it!
"Social Credit" (the only current alternative on offer) will reverse the cost-debt spiral cycle and set us on a path of recovery!
It's your choice of course!![]()
i agree that the pension age needs to be raised, and it should have been 3 years ago to be 67 now, and in the next 10 years it should be around 70ish,
i doubt by the time i get there it will even be around,
Fucked if I know, I just wanna argueor it could be that none of the current party's deserve my vote as none of them are aligned with how I'd like to see the country run. I won't just use it because I have it, unlike the majority it would seem. Unlike those idiots that voted the Nats in a) because they wanted Labour out, b) even though they don't want asset sales, c) because there's no-one else to vote for, so may as well vote similarly to my nearest and dearest because they must know what they're voting for...
![]()
![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks