If only that were true. I once knew a bloke who bought a Harley as his "mates" all had bikes and he wanted the best, this was not a young chap and one who you might have thought would have a little bit of a clue, of course he had no licence but was of the opinion that a motorcycle was no different to a bicycle and no licence required.
He apparently upon receiving his first incorrect licence type went back to the dealers and threatened legal action as they never informed him of the requirement for said licence.![]()
Its not the destination that is important its the journey.
My Honda CB250 was a Honda NAS, which is a freakin weird looking concept bike.
Never in the field of human conflict has so much been owed to so few by so many cheese eating surrender monkeys.
(Winston Churchill on the French.)
A lot of bikes the official model is different from what's on the badge.
Interesting observation, can't wait to see it on reality tv!![]()
Arse! I just had to go out to the garage to check and did not expect any surprises. I got one! My Bandit is a GSF600S. My rego label though showed it as a GSF600SY (Being the fully faired model and not the half faired I have). When I checked the actual registration documents they correctly showed it being a GSF600S. Interesting then when I checked the VTNZ details from the last WOF and that also showed it as a GSF600SY. Just really strange that the rego document and the rego label were different given that surely they came from the same source data.
Moot point for this argument anyway as neither model is approved.
Grow older but never grow up
True that, I've got a Zephyr 750 which on the rego papers is a ZR750, the only place you'll find that on the bike is if you look at the frame/engine number.
Unless you have a 2000 model that was registered in 2001, in which case the Suzuki year designation is Y, and is sometimes added on to the end of the model.
Have this with my DRZ, it's a 400EY on the rego label, E model and year 2000, but the LAMS list only has a 400S and 400E so is mine learner legal?
Riding cheap crappy old bikes badly since 1987
Tagorama maps: Transalpers map first 100 tags..................Map of tags 101-200......................Latest map, tag # 201-->
Moot points count too. It highlights one of the inadequacies of the system.
My current bike is shown as silver in the system. The manufacturer calls it champagne. Anyone I ask says its gold. When you register a bike, even the smallest error follows the bike through its life.
The problem is the volume. There is so much we are expected to know, it's kind of huge. Nobody knows everything, not even Akzle.
On 1 October the new Search and Surveillance Act comes into force, and that's dwarfed anything else. I doubt that LAMS gets a look in. I raised it in Chur Chur, and virtually nobody had heard of it. I ran a few training sessions for the people who might need to know, but it's very under the radar.
If you asked most people how important it was, it'd wouldn't get a mention. It's big to us, as a motorcycle group, but we are a rare breed at best. Most people don't give bikes a second thought, unless it's to complain about them, so LAMS is a micro issue at best.
Therein lies the problem. All the main bits have been right on my vehicles, except for the seat count on the van. It was 2, with 6 seats present. I asked nicely for them to change it when I did my rego, only to be told it needed re-vinning/certing or some shit.
Why don't they allow shit like this to be corrected easily, bike shops know the difference between the models, so why can't they change the details when doing a wof or whatever. Then it would be up to the owner to ensure their bike's details are on the LAMS list if they are a learner, and cops could issue tickets on such technicalities which could be overturned if the details were corrected.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Yeah. I was working on the Motor Registration counter in the 80s when they bought the change in to plain colour descriptions. The one I always remembered and one that highlighted the problem was a Ford vehicle I think that came in 'Sirocco'. Anyone care to guess what colour that might be?
Grow older but never grow up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks