Boston bombing

[mashman]

Just a hunch?
Not taking the piss but there is not much in the way of proof for this theory is there?
Edit, Ooh, 300 posts!

Where's the proof for the theory that the guys that were shot/caught were responsible for the bombing? Oh, hang on, I know the answer to this. It comes from those who are to be believed without question.

[Laava]

Where's the proof for the theory that the guys that were shot/caught were responsible for the bombing? Oh, hang on, I know the answer to this. It comes from those who are to be believed without question.

So what is YOUR theory then? Assuming you have one.

[Maha]

So what is YOUR theory then? Assuming you have one.

Anyone who subscribes to a conspiracy theory does not have to justify their wayward thinking. Apparently, it's up the level headed amongst us to prove them wrong.

[Edbear]

Anyone who subscribes to a conspiracy theory does not have to justify their wayward thinking. Apparently, it's up the level headed amongst us to prove them wrong.

They are beyond help, I'm afraid...

[mashman]

So what is YOUR theory then? Assuming you have one.

MY theory is that if I were heading up whichever organisation runs the world, you'd all be zombies by now. MY theory is that some people will go to any lengths to stimulate an economy. MY theory is that there are people who will do anything that they are told to do. MY theory is that should I have know that the finish line was under threat, I would have lined it with undercover officers looking for people who have left bags behind. I'm pretty sure you would have done similar. MY theory is that terror is good for business, good for keeping people down, good for getting more budget for security, good for justifying unreasonable measures taken by govts and those who guide them. As I said before. If I were in charge of such decisions and my goal was to keep keep you all in line, you would all be chipped by now. So MY theory is, terror is good for business and in certain cases I believe that that terror is allowed to happen.

If you're asking who I blame directly. Then I blame everyone that promotes an environment where these sorts of things take place under the name of freedom. Ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Anyone who subscribes to a conspiracy theory does not have to justify their wayward thinking. Apparently, it's up the level headed amongst us to prove them wrong.

Well, where's your proof?

They are beyond help, I'm afraid...

[Edbear]

MY theory is that if I were heading up whichever organisation runs the world, you'd all be zombies by now. MY theory is that some people will go to any lengths to stimulate an economy. MY theory is that there are people who will do anything that they are told to do. MY theory is that should I have know that the finish line was under threat, I would have lined it with undercover officers looking for people who have left bags behind. I'm pretty sure you would have done similar. MY theory is that terror is good for business, good for keeping people down, good for getting more budget for security, good for justifying unreasonable measures taken by govts and those who guide them. As I said before. If I were in charge of such decisions and my goal was to keep keep you all in line, you would all be chipped by now. So MY theory is, terror is good for business and in certain cases I believe that that terror is allowed to happen.

If you're asking who I blame directly. Then I blame everyone that promotes an environment where these sorts of things take place under the name of freedom. Ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm



Well, where's your proof?

Conspiracy theorists do not accept contrary evidence as proof. Every theory of 9/11 has been debunked but that hasn't stopped the conspiracy theorist from firmly believing it was a US Govt. job.

As I have said, I spent months investigating all aspects of the incident to see if there may be any truth in the conspiracy theory.

Even in this thread, so many points have been proven wrong about the Boston bombing but what difference has it made to the gullible?

[Katman]

Even in this thread, so many points have been proven wrong about the Boston bombing but what difference has it made to the gullible?

Ed, the definition of gullible is believing everything you're told without question - regardless of how many questions there may be that beg answering.

[mashman]

Conspiracy theorists do not accept contrary evidence as proof. Every theory of 9/11 has been debunked but that hasn't stopped the conspiracy theorist from firmly believing it was a US Govt. job.

As I have said, I spent months investigating all aspects of the incident to see if there may be any truth in the conspiracy theory.

Even in this thread, so many points have been proven wrong about the Boston bombing but what difference has it made to the gullible?

What you're saying is that anything other than the official story is a conspiracy. Contrary evidence and plausible explanations i.e. why was the finish line area not lined with undercover police looking for discarded items, are valid. They are questions that must be asked and must receive satisfactory answers.

You have not answered any question put to you without any doubt. You have done nothing but retreat behind the conspiracy banner which is typical of those who don't actually have any answers, yet espouse the official story as lore and call others gullible irrespective of their point of view and/or their reasons for that point of view. Quite funny really.

[gwigs]

[QUOTE=Edbear;1130546856] . Every theory of 9/11 has been debunked


Oh really ,not as far as I,m concerned ...too many unanswered questions.
I recommend you watch some of the docos on the subject...
Farenheit 911
Loose Change 911
heres a couple that might get you thinking..

[oneofsix]

I see the conspiracy theorists are shifting their ground. Instead of the offical story is all bullshit and it was a government plot they now want proof that the official story is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Seems the total plot conspiracy theory is leaking. Anyone that believes the official story is the whole truth and nothing but the truth is as gullible as those that believed the original conspiracy line and still believe 9/11 was all conspiracy and that the moon landings didn't happen.

[Katman]

As I have said, I spent months investigating all aspects of the incident to see if there may be any truth in the conspiracy theory.

Is your investigation more qualified than all these structural engineers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

[Edbear]

[QUOTE=gwigs;1130546879]

. Every theory of 9/11 has been debunked


Oh really ,not as far as I,m concerned ...too many unanswered questions.
I recommend you watch some of the docos on the subject...
Farenheit 911
Loose Change 911
heres a couple that might get you thinking..

Is your investigation more qualified than all these structural engineers?

[url]

I said, I spent months on it. I have seen all the videos, all the documentaries, all the official and unofficial comments. Nothing you can post I will not have seen and investigated from all sides and angles. I suggest for a start, you Google "9/11 debunked" and go from there.

[Katman]

I said, I spent months on it. I have seen all the videos, all the documentaries, all the official and unofficial comments. Nothing you can post I will not have seen and investigated from all sides and angles. I suggest for a start, you Google "9/11 debunked" and go from there.

So your opinion is more qualified than all those structural engineering experts?

What exactly are your structural engineering qualifications Ed?

[Edbear]

So your opinion is more qualified than all those structural engineering experts?

Look, I know you're as thick as two short planks, but to put it as simply as I can, my opinion is based on all the evidence for and against. It's what is called personal research. You know, getting together all the expert and qualified evidence available and doing something foreign to many here... Reading it!

[Katman]

Look, I know you're as thick as two short planks, but to put it as simply as I can, my opinion is based on all the evidence for and against. It's what is called personal research. You know, getting together all the expert and qualified evidence available and doing something foreign to many here... Reading it!

So all those other experts are wrong but you're right?

You're an incredibly stupid man Ed.