Not my words, I just agree with the verdict of many highly qualified people. That's the funny thing about you and the others of your opinion, you think that if I agree with a qualified person, then that qualified person must be wrong.
If you're so much cleverer, what is your opinion on who dunnit?
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Cry me a river, Pete. As long as you're happy.
The little minds are biting tonight. Hi Blackdog!
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Yip. I did my bestest, but making am argument that agrees with Ed was too much for me.
You're on your own fella.
Bain case contradicts that assertion.
They thought Robin was the killer and tried to find evidence to support their theory. Couldn't find any.
Dude in charge told them to go back and let the evidence speak for itself. The weight of evidence led to an obvious conclusion and so they charged David.
As the Court of Appeal noted - 'you won't find a jury in the land that would find David not guilty'.
The tide of media over the succeeding years changed that.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks