
Originally Posted by
cassina
So you have reservations about some aspect of their training too but still hold them in high regard just the same. So don't put me down because I pick a possible fault with their teaching of fast being safe based on poster 1s claim/impression. If their teaching is in the police training handbook how come the road speed tolerance has been lowered as it would go against IAMs dogma would it not?
My only reservation relates to one tiny part of a whole manual. Which smallish book I recommend. If you can only have one motorcycling book that's the one to have IMNSHO, but I can't give you one. Every one of the several copies I have owned have been passed on to newer riders. And at 38 years or whatever, you would qualify.
The IAM is a British based organisation, their training is based on the British Police manual. There would be very few people in the NZ Police force who would have taken their training if any. Even less would be qualified to teach it, unless some of/one of the more recent Brit imports are thus qualified.
WTF would our silly (apparently failed) holiday tolerances have to do with anything?
May I suggest that you look at Blackbird's posts on the IAM in other threads and in his blogs, then at least you will have an inkling of what you are writing about.
I don't want to be rude but sadly I'm reminded of Mark Twain's admonition, "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Bookmarks