Stupid World

[husaberg]

Let him have his moment of glory, he'll be intolerable otherwise and I doubt his missus deserves that.

I gave him 30% in 2 day's rather than his 40% in 90 days, maybe his Maths is not so flash
Someones getting sold short that's for sure

[bogan]

Whatever it was worth when it began will mean nought to the poor bastid that bought his in Dec 2013.
When was the last time our currency depreciated 40% in 90 dyas?

And that's within its first 10 years, who knows what it'll fuck up in the next ten

[Oscar]

No game. Dunno. When did it? Anyway, why are you shifting the goalposts to property in NZ when we were discussing virtual currency and global virtual currency?

Er - you mentioned property, not me.
Feel free to answer the question using the NZ$ though.

[Oscar]

I gave him 30% in 2 day's rather than his 40% in 90 days, maybe his Maths is not so flash
Someones getting sold short that's for sure

Still not 40% in 90 days, though.
It was Mashy that posed the question, not me.

[husaberg]

Still not 40% in 90 days, though.
It was Mashy that posed the question, not me.

40%/90 days =.44/day. You are looking at part of the question that was posed, and then looking at only part of my answer...............

[Brian d marge]

Cant we set fire to the city and blame the christians?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[husaberg]

Cant we set fire to the city and blame the christians?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

"Well, I don't know as I want a lawyer to tell me what I cannot do. I hire him to tell how to do what I want to do."

J. P. Morgan

[mashman]

Er - you mentioned property, not me.
Feel free to answer the question using the NZ$ though.

But that's OK, coz the US IRS says that the Bitcoin isn't currency, it's property...

Hmmmmmmm.
Sigh... another who doesn't like the answers he's given:

Dunno. When did it?

[Oscar]

40%/90 days =.44/day. You are looking at part of the question that was posed, and then looking at only part of my answer...............

Your answer was interesting, but related to a currency that was regulated and then floated - after all that time with a regulated value it was bound to jump one way or another.

Besides, the question was to mashy, who said:

You can say the same thing about the stock market or housing or land or or or or or.
Don't you mean, when was the last time property depreciated 40%.

He was inferring that those markets are just as volatile as the BitCoin.
I merely asked him to prove it.

[Oscar]

Hmmmmmmm.
Sigh... another who doesn't like the answers he's given:

What answers?
It was your question:

You can say the same thing about the stock market or housing or land or or or or or.
Don't you mean, when was the last time property depreciated 40%.

I just wondered if you had an answer.

[mashman]

What answers?
It was your question:

I just wondered if you had an answer.

Dunno was one of them.

The question whas rhetorical.

[Oscar]

Dunno was one of them.

The question whas rhetorical.

Bullshit.
You said "..you can say the same thing about the stock market or housing or land or or or or or.."
That was not a question, it was a statement.
A statement that you don't seem to be able to back up.

[mashman]

Bullshit.
You said "..you can say the same thing about the stock market or housing or land or or or or or.."
That was not a question, it was a statement.
A statement that you don't seem to be able to back up.

Oh I see, you want to shift the goal posts yet again. In which case the context was as follows:

Whatever it was worth when it began will mean nought to the poor bastid that bought his in Dec 2013.
When was the last time our currency depreciated 40% in 90 dyas?

You can say the same thing about the stock market or housing or land or or or or or.
Don't you mean, when was the last time property depreciated 40%.

I noted that you used two distinct sentences (informal paragraphs) and therefore responded in exactly the same way.

Therefore sentence 1 refers to your statement that was sentence (informal paragraph) one, similarly with sentence (informal paragraph) 2.

By all means shift the goal posts again to try to frame your argument to suit your purposes. If all else fails it gives me much pleasure to watch you dance like a marionette. Thanks for that BTW.

[Oscar]

Oh I see, you want to shift the goal posts yet again. In which case the context was as follows:





I noted that you used two distinct sentences (informal paragraphs) and therefore responded in exactly the same way.

Therefore sentence 1 refers to your statement that was sentence (informal paragraph) one, similarly with sentence (informal paragraph) 2.

By all means shift the goal posts again to try to frame your argument to suit your purposes. If all else fails it gives me much pleasure to watch you dance like a marionette. Thanks for that BTW.

What a moran.
You've got nothing, have you?
You made the statement, but you fail to back it up.
When you paint yourself into a corner, you try and make out that you planned it all along...

[Banditbandit]

Cant we set fire to the city and blame the christians?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Sorry - that's been done - it's a "Funny Once" joke ...