Yea it was, and it's better now with wider power and another HP, ESE helped me with some tips on tidying the porting, cutting the back of the piston down by another 2mm and useing a kart carb, I also made a new pipe and increased the stinger diameter, the worse thing with the TF is the gearbox so I changed it for a TS 125 .
I can remember him saying that they respond far faster than the rev counter Strike two.
He did say a decent rider worth his salt should be sacked if he was ever below 10000 rpm or something
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...6&d=1365770361
http://www.siegertyamaha.com/MotorradVerk/C214a.jpg
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...5&d=1365769602
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...4&d=1334571540
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...5&d=1358678743
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...8&d=1340504707
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...1&d=1340505276
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...7&d=1360050367
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Or easy.
I thought this was an idea to OPEN the class up to MORE riders. Instead you either ride a diesel or have be rich or an engineer. I don't like the options and the attitude that everything is ok. It's not.
Over and out. Can't be fucked with old school thinking. Some of you should be on the MNZ Board. No changes unless it suits you personally.
If it ain't smokin', it's broken.
Unless a standard MX85 only makes 12-14 rwhp which is where TF-TS-GP-RX125's etc and the FXR150's (14rwhp) start from then a standard MX85 more than levels the playing field, they are a significant head start on whatever is legal and currently available.
If MX85's are to come in so as to make more 2T's available for Bucket racing, then to be fair to everyone, open rules with only there capacity limited would be my pick for a level playing field. That way it gives the accomplished fiddlers something new to work with too.
Agreed^ Shit even factory cylinders would be a great idea as they'd need to be re-plated if ported because of the nikasil. This would prevent all but the most keen from tackling them.
I even think the maximum chamber diameter was a great idea although that might not really be applicable as the engines we all seem to build are aimed towards a large spread of power. Super easy to enforce. Buckets is no place for complex rules which require a load of effort to police.
I have no plans to built one. Can you not read?
If it ain't smokin', it's broken.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
The engine was built when I got it, it was in a RG50 frame, people have said it was a Pete Sales bike but I'm not sure, Rob from ESE Would give you the port timing numbers as I've never written them down, it runs TKRJ normal pistons with a little skim of the dome for a better shape and 8mm of the back of the skirt, standard crank, standard steel reeds (changed every year) o ring head, Honda CR85 ignition 3rd generation self made pipe, ESE have said much more can be had from it but I would hate to loose the reliability, I get my kicks from racing it rather than searching for more power.
The 85mx debate has been very interesting but a little confusing, the lap times have tumbled in the last two years with guys spending more and more on getting power, I hope some don't get put of racing because they don't have the budget or experience to build a competitive machine .
Fully agree. There's where the real agenda lies!
I treat Nat's bike as the one to beat, so the aspiration is to try to achieve this within the rules.
And we are happy to try out a two-stroke within the current rules.
If we were moaners, we could harp on about the lack of 100cc four strokes available for us to use in F5, but no worries, we'll have a crack at that too in time, within the rules.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks