Mark Lundy - miscarriage of justice?

[Crasherfromwayback]

Amber was found dead outside the bedroom, she wasn't in the room when the mother was killed.

Doesn't explain (neither can he) the blood in the boot of his car.

Thought she'd disturbed the killer doing the bizz? If she was in or near the doorway I've no doubt she'd have been sprayed. And why wouldn't traces of it be in his boot? You never get anything out of the boot of your car? What possible motivation did the Bro have? And where did Lundies full tank of fuel go over night?

[korimako1]

Why so? He found the dead bodies and checked Ambers pulse. Hardly surprising he had their blood on him no?

he said he never touched Christine, and he was in his truck. How did blood get in the boot of his car.

[Banditbandit]

The blood may have got there on a previous occassion ....

[Drew]

If there is no other evidence supporting the brother as the killer, does the blood provide reasonable doubt for Lundy?

Wouldn't like to have to make the cool.

[Bassmatt]

Thought she'd disturbed the killer doing the bizz? If she was in or near the doorway I've no doubt she'd have been sprayed. And why wouldn't traces of it be in his boot? You never get anything out of the boot of your car? What possible motivation did the Bro have? And where did Lundies full tank of fuel go over night?

No doubt? How far was the bed from the doorway, is it a straight line between the bad and the doorway or is the bed "round the corner"
Why wouldn't traces be in his boot? - How did it get there? It lit up "like a glowworm" we are not talking a couple of specks.
I haven't followed the case at all, but when I read about this I just thought "here we go again, cops trying to fit the evidence to the person they have decided must have done it, and ignoring everything else.

The blood may have got there on a previous occassion ....

Then he should be able to explain it?

[mossy1200]

if she made it onto the jury, the judge was quite clear about not using face book, twitter and sites like this.

Nah the call up was almost 2 months ago and when she was told 8-10 weeks she wrote in and got removed from list. We didn't know what case it was just a date and probable time period.

[korimako1]

Thought she'd disturbed the killer doing the bizz? If she was in or near the doorway I've no doubt she'd have been sprayed. And why wouldn't traces of it be in his boot? You never get anything out of the boot of your car? What possible motivation did the Bro have? And where did Lundies full tank of fuel go over night?

he said he never touched Christine, although what you say about the blood transfer from mother to daughter is fair enough, but he only felt her wrist for a pulse. He was in his truck. How did blood get in the boot of his car. as for motivation, covering up an inappropriate relationship with his niece is right up there. His older brother, Neil, went to jail for sexual assault on his step daughter, she said it was also uncle Glenn.
evidence about fuel is still to come

[Crasherfromwayback]

he said he never touched Christine, and he was in his truck. How did blood get in the boot of his car.

See post # 496

[Crasherfromwayback]

.
evidence about fuel is still to come

I'll look forward to hearing about it.

[Bassmatt]

See post # 496

Yeah, nah, post #496 doesn't explain how the blood got in the boot of his car.
His car wasn't there.
If it was a case of him contaminating the boot with blood because he got something out of it or put something in there at the time, he would have an explanation - he can't explain how it got there.

[korimako1]

If there is no other evidence supporting the brother as the killer, does the blood provide reasonable doubt for Lundy?

Wouldn't like to have to make the cool.

well you would think so, blood at your house, blood in the boot of your car. whereas nothing found on Lundy, in his car, anywhere. a speck of something found on his shirt, evidence to be heard about that. reasonable doubt definitely

[oldrider]

Sounds to me that this re-trial might be worth the money - interesting to say the least!

[Hitcher]

It's Mark Lundy who is on trial, not Glenn Weggery.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Yeah, nah, post #496 doesn't explain how the blood got in the boot of his car.
His car wasn't there.
If it was a case of him contaminating the boot with blood because he got something out of it or put something in there at the time, he would have an explanation - he can't explain how it got there.

Yeah I hear ya. No reason why something he contaminated in his truck didn't end up in his car later is there?

[korimako1]

It's Mark Lundy who is on trial, not Glenn Weggery.

correct, but as the question so frequently asked on this site and others, if not ML then who? now you have a viable alternative. Even the cops thought so till they were blinded by science.