I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
The leaders of the University of British Columbia have announced (starts at 25 seconds in) it is standing behind a published report that provides "linea definitive evidence that substances added to vaccines greatly increase the chances that the recipient will develop autoimmune diseases including those listed on the Autism spectrum".
But that's ok because the CDC (Center for Disease Cultivation) and big Pharma (who have 100 % legal immunity from prosecution if their vaccines cause side effects up to and including death) say it's ok.
The process of terror promotion will see to it that fear engenders more fear so that terrified pussies will rabidly condem anyone who questions the biased self policing pharmaceutical juggernauts who profit from poisoning their scared witless customers.
Yay team pussies.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Has he done any confirmatory studies or does he still rely on passive monitoring as he has in the past? The claimed link between such elements and autism has been around for a number of years, but no studies show it to be causally correlated. However, we do know the elimination of life threating/taking diseases and illnesses is casually correlated with the vaccines.
Yay team science.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
My mate has a kid with autism caused by being vaccinated, pretty much the same thing happen as this women's describing http://youtu.be/eMrFV2rnHlo?t=3m52s that's enough evidence for me you muppet
team science is a joke.
Interesting - could you provide a link to the Peer Reviewed study of your mate's kid's Autism that shows a definitive causal link between the Autism and the Vaccine?
Team Science is what has allowed you to spew your putrid opinion forth into the public domain - without Team Science, you would be derided as the village idiot and be the recipient of rotten fruit based projectiles
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Now you're being silly. Using your mate as a statistical sample of one is enough to prove a tenuous hypothesis? Okay I'll do likewise. I had sandwiches for lunch today. Straight afterwards I whacked my shin when climbing over my trailer draw-bar. Therefore I have proven that sandwiches cause sore shins. It's all a bit silly isn't it?
Autism is almost always diagnosed at the age when children are being immunised. It is an understandable fallacy to link the two, but it is just as flawed as the sandwich/shins hypothesis. There has been no statistically proven and verified evidence that immunised children are more likely to develop autism that un-immunised children. All such studies have been shown to be either flawed - or worse - fraudulently skewed and misrepresented.
Current thinking is that autism is a complex disorder in which multiple factors must co-occur. Many environmental factors (mainly pre-natal) are being investigated, with the post-natal immunisation factor already eliminated.
Can I believe the magic of your size... (The Shirelles)
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Bookmarks