They've weighed in on his theories before.
Why hasn't it been fully appreciated?
So far there is no viable working theory or tests thereof. There is no working model showing any superiority to conventional engines, or even showing it runs on hydrogen. After 25odd years too. What makes you think the courts were wrong to send him to slammer/nuthouse?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Even if it was debunked by chemist or engineers it could be still a big oil in a conspiracy plot
The inventor claims they drilled his teeth.
he also reportedly charges 3500 dollar for a weekend seminar to show people how it works.
Free seems pretty expensive these days.
http://kfor.com/2012/11/09/the-man-w...e-magic-motor/
http://okgazette.com/2013/01/02/liquid-energy
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informe...-and-his-motor
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
The bit where despite admittedly not having the background to have made a call on the veracity of this guy's work, you seem to have made one anyway.
We covered quite a range of chemistry background as part of the modern engineering degree, you can't create hydrogen with heat and a bit or iron/fuel; it just isn't possible as it would violate the conservation of energy principals (which numerous PhD's in numerous fields have weighed in on and agreed with).
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
What happened to the nz guy that was running a buell on water about 20 years ago?
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Have a look at this video its about 2.30 minutes in.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks