Bravo Ken.
Why not? Just do it.
& to be fair W-D, you have added comments of an off-technical subject type, yourself..
If we are to be frankly open & honest here, the somewhat hostile tone which originated from a certain contributor - can be clearly seen - in verbatim script.
For myself, I'd prefer to keep discussions on a reasoned, cooly technical basis.. rather than some over-personalised, prickly ego-thrashing..
Shall we now - put the posturing in the past, & resume a decent discourse?
I am up for it..
It's the link on the quote of the post you just answered, - moderator has deleted it, (no harm done I guess, just seems to be a general tightening up on the rules since the 'upheaval' started) - it does make your post seem a little irrelavent though!![]()
I asked that too, and the effective firing order is just that, two up, two down. Unlike a TZ750 which is 1/4 2/3 it is 1/3 and 2/4 pairing. BUT it is what it is, 180 degree.
Source: I think the photos earlier by Husa should be sufficient. Crank pins are arranged relative to the V angle, supporting this is also the period magazine references.
Thanks Husa for adding those ex post facto ( best if you note the addit/edit timing though) NSR 500 crankshaft pix on the previous page.
Frits has given his views on the potential benefits of 90`firing for 4cyl 2Ts, but I am sure we'd all value Wobbly's appraisal too..
You drive a Subaru - cage- to work? Tsk tsk..
Anyhow, if interested in engine firing orders, see here.. www.enginehistory.org/fo/FO.shtml
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks