Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 157

Thread: Motorcyclist spotted going 261kmh in Canterbury

  1. #31
    Join Date
    9th May 2008 - 21:23
    Bike
    A
    Location
    B
    Posts
    2,547
    Quote Originally Posted by EJK View Post
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crim...-in-canterbury

    All black riding gears and a black road bike...

    Someone fess up!
    Nobody will fess up...for not getting it into top gear and all

  2. #32
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by Moi View Post
    Calling Myth Busters... we have a test for you... and a victim, sorry, participant as well...

    Just check youtube.. its old hat.. & if you really dig.. you'll find such stunts were staples of 'Barnstormer - Flying Circus' routines,
    going back many decades - way back to nearly a century ago..

    & Glenn Curtiss riding a V8 bike - was clocked at nearly 220 km/h.. 108 years ago.. on the beach..

  3. #33
    Join Date
    4th October 2010 - 17:53
    Bike
    2009 KTM990
    Location
    On top of your wife
    Posts
    226
    Prob down the pub tonight bragging it was him during one beer and moaning about the Acc bike safety levies during the next before mounting up shouting "FTP" half pissed and speeding home......Not like the cops to post speeds reached as to avoid copy cat one ups.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    19th January 2013 - 16:56
    Bike
    a 400 and a 650 :-)
    Location
    The Isthmus
    Posts
    1,611
    Quote Originally Posted by J.A.W. View Post
    Just check youtube.. its old hat.. & if you really dig.. you'll find such stunts were staples of 'Barnstormer - Flying Circus' routines,
    going back many decades - way back to nearly a century ago..

    & Glenn Curtiss riding a V8 bike - was clocked at nearly 220 km/h.. 108 years ago.. on the beach..
    I was actually referring to this post:

    Nope.

    Weight has nothing to do with the speed at which something falls.

    As per someone else - its all about Wind resistance.

    I'd do an approximate that a Harley would actually fall slower than a person (depending on how it fell, but I would guess it would end up semi on it's side in a sort of flat spin) - which I think would generate more drag than a human body.

    Would actually be a fantastic experiment to do.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by Moi View Post
    I was actually referring to this post:

    Nope.

    Weight has nothing to do with the speed at which something falls.

    As per someone else - its all about Wind resistance.

    I'd do an approximate that a Harley would actually fall slower than a person (depending on how it fell, but I would guess it would end up semi on it's side in a sort of flat spin) - which I think would generate more drag than a human body.

    Would actually be a fantastic experiment to do.

    Well, duh..

    Its been done, as I noted.. for a long time..

    & the answer is obvious to anyone who watches X-games, aint it?

    Likely, a big ol' H-D bagger would - if given a long enough fall to stabilize, go nose down..
    ..due to the nose fairing, & big-as bags at the back - which have been tested to be stable at speed, as on road..

  6. #36
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    What if it was Ex-AB skipper Richie McCaw?
    Y'know, thrill seeking to keep up the buzz..

    Would they let him off with a 'private discussion' - due to public sentiment/political imperative..
    Or would they openly crucify him?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    24th April 2005 - 11:16
    Bike
    XB12S
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    172
    I returned the bike to its owner after a test ride around the block and assured him it was a nice bike but unfortunately didnt meet my needs as it wasnt fast enough .

  8. #38
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    Yes I had a few people at work today point that out to me. And look disturbed when I laughed.

    Love the description - black bike and rider wearing black.....

  9. #39
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxr View Post
    I returned the bike to its owner after a test ride around the block and assured him it was a nice bike but unfortunately didnt meet my needs as it wasnt fast enough .

    Why not? Weren't the exhaust header pipes 'balanced'? L.O.L...

    & as if you can get your old shitbox WN 750 anywhere near that speed..

  10. #40
    Join Date
    25th June 2007 - 21:21
    Bike
    S1000RR
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    6,988
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    Yes I had a few people at work today point that out to me. And look disturbed when I laughed.

    Love the description - black bike and rider wearing black.....
    Well that massively filters out all the Power Rangers that rides over to Akaroa!


    If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,493
    Quote Originally Posted by J.A.W. View Post
    Likely, a big ol' H-D bagger would - if given a long enough fall to stabilize, go nose down..
    ..due to the nose fairing, & big-as bags at the back - which have been tested to be stable at speed, as on road..
    I'm not so sure - I remember the Mythbusters episode about Bullets fall, tumbling through the air:

    https://youtu.be/wVYmrp54B4M?t=1440

    So assuming most of the weight on a HD would be nearer to the rear of the bike than the centre of the bike (anyone got any data on that?)

    I think we would see a tumbling harley...

    But as I said before - would love to see it done.
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  12. #42
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    I'm not so sure - I remember the Mythbusters episode about Bullets fall, tumbling through the air:

    https://youtu.be/wVYmrp54B4M?t=1440

    So assuming most of the weight on a HD would be nearer to the rear of the bike than the centre of the bike (anyone got any data on that?)

    I think we would see a tumbling harley...

    But as I said before - would love to see it done.

    C'mon fella, sometimes I think you are deliberately acting out the hokey retard routine..

    Of course - stability at speed - testing is done, with US liability laws, its a must do..

    & I recall the motorcycle cops in NZ whinged, because an ex-Pom 'Speed Cop' WFO'd his unstable Honda 750/4 cop bike..
    ..against the advice of his colleagues, who knew better, & had an injurious high speed tank-slapper get-off..

    You claim to punt a big ol' GSX-R 1300 'Bus', do you really imagine it wouldn't go nose down - if dropped from 30,000ft?

  13. #43
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    Quote Originally Posted by rambaldi View Post
    That assumes that they aren't less aerodynamic
    Well, you'd have to take of the tassels, obviously

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    Nope.

    Weight has nothing to do with the speed at which something falls.

    As per someone else - its all about Wind resistance.

    I'd do an approximate that a Harley would actually fall slower than a person (depending on how it fell, but I would guess it would end up semi on it's side in a sort of flat spin) - which I think would generate more drag than a human body.

    Would actually be a fantastic experiment to do.
    False. Weight has nothing to do with the speed at which something accelerates initially. It has everything to do with terminal velocity, simply due to drag being a speed dependent reaction force to the weight force.

    More importantly, if you put enough tassels on the rear of it, would it stabilise like an arrow?
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  14. #44
    Join Date
    4th October 2010 - 17:53
    Bike
    2009 KTM990
    Location
    On top of your wife
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by bogan View Post
    Well, you'd have to take of the tassels, obviously



    False. Weight has nothing to do with the speed at which something accelerates initially. It has everything to do with terminal velocity, simply due to drag being a speed dependent reaction force to the weight force.

    More importantly, if you put enough tassels on the rear of it, would it stabilise like an arrow?
    Well it is a Harley so I would assume both bike and rider would have tassels fitted lol......

  15. #45
    Join Date
    26th August 2015 - 15:32
    Bike
    1980 Yamaha RD/H2 750
    Location
    Ballina N.S.W.
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by RGVforme View Post
    Well it is a Harley so I would assume both bike and rider would have tassels fitted lol......
    Look fella, if'n tassels were good'nuff for ol' rip-roarin'est fightin' man Daniel Boon & grizzly bear & Mex munchin' Davy Crockett..

    But seriously, never mind the bloody tassels, what are H-D mini skulls & cow bells all about?


    Mind you, the likes of Evel Knievel & Cal Rayborn hammered hi-po H-D's without any of that crap a' danglin'..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •