My first poll for the NZ public

[Jin]

The reason this particular group of lunatics are desperate to believe that money is pulled from some fairy bankers arsehole and doesn't actually represent anything worthwhile is that admiting that wealth can actually be manufactured means that they are indeed personally responsible for their own prosperity.

And if they only believe hard enough then their lack of success is someone else's fault.

Pathetic, I know, but that's the reason for all of the bizarre tantrums and irrelevant answers to simple questions.

I find bleeding heart liberals, communists and this new breed of rbe fans are usually well meaning with the best of intentions and try to give them the benefit of the doubt. They want equality and fairness. Even lenin and pol pot were well meaning individuals but as they say the path to hell is paved with gold.

[Ocean1]

Did you accept his counterfeit marbles? Or does he still owe you?

He's in the same boat as you, he's lost the fucking lot.

[Ocean1]

they say the path to hell is paved with gold.

Marbles, apparently.

[mashman]

I think its perfectly reasonable to ask how resources will be allocated under a rbe. You are saying we should get rid of money and prices. So you need to at least explain what replaces it. You think resources can be placed anywhere so how does that happen?

You still didn't answer the question put to you that my 13 yr old answered without blinking an eye... but I know why you, nor TDL for that matter, will answer that question

[Jin]

Says a lot when these guys rail against the corrupt monetary system and prices yet are unable to say what would replace it. Come on guys just tell us either you dont want to say, you dont know or are still trying to figure it out. Which is it?

[mashman]

He's in the same boat as you, he's lost the fucking lot.

Funny. I'm 45, retired at 44, and have a mortgage small enough to manage. He still works. Seems like I have absolutely everything and have lost absolutely nothing. I must be much more successful than any of you

[mashman]

Says a lot when these guys rail against the corrupt monetary system and prices yet are unable to say what would replace it. Come on guys just tell us either you dont want to say, you dont know or are still trying to figure it out. Which is it?

I'll ask again then:

Figure it out for yourself ... it ain't hard. As a starter for ya ya lazy fuck, do you think any group of people should receive better resources than another?

Like I said, my 13yr old didn't hesitate, as the answer to that question will define how I answer what you need to know.

[Ocean1]

Funny. I'm 45, retired at 44, and have a mortgage small enough to manage. He still works. Seems like I have absolutely everything and have lost absolutely nothing. I must be much more successful than any of you

Well yeah. Except for the raving lunacy thing. That's probably not something anyone else would define as success.

But if that's your thing then by all means go for it. Just wipe your chin a bit first, eh? It's sorta gross.

[mashman]

Well yeah. Except for the raving lunacy thing. That's probably not something anyone else would define as success.

But if that's your thing then by all means go for it. Just wipe your chin a bit first, eh? It's sorta gross.

Really? By definition I'm classed as a philanthropist

Tricky to avoid when you have as few front teeth as I do. You're just gonna have to get over it, or at the very least take an extra pace backwards.

[Woodman]

Figure it out for yourself ... it ain't hard. As a starter for ya ya lazy fuck, do you think any group of people should receive better resources than another?

Define "resource".

[mashman]

I find bleeding heart liberals, communists and this new breed of rbe fans are usually well meaning with the best of intentions and try to give them the benefit of the doubt. They want equality and fairness. Even lenin and pol pot were well meaning individuals but as they say the path to hell is paved with gold.

No, I'm after equity, so, wrong again dickhead.

[mashman]

Define "resource".

human, animal, vegetable, mineral in their various states.

[Woodman]

human, animal, vegetable, mineral in their various states.

If one group of people are prepared to pay more dollars for a better vegetable, then yes.

[Brian d marge]

Done.........

I'll give u three goats for your house

And ur answer ... so can... if money is interchangeable with assets

Can I but a can of beer using my or my wife's assets ...

I think not and assets aren't fungible

I e ya can't cut it up into equal valued bits ... ie 10 dollars is 10 x 1 dollar

Try doing that will a Picasso painting

..so no... as per

You have failed again in your attempt

Try again .....


sent for a divine source

[Jin]

I'll ask again then:



Like I said, my 13yr old didn't hesitate, as the answer to that question will define how I answer what you need to know.

I don't know if any group should receive better resources. It depends on the need of the group. People decide for themselves what they want and vote with their money. It's not for me to judge. That is a fundamental basis for believing in freedom.

And my opinion is irrelevant. The fact is under a free market and price system those who pay the most get more. You want to remove that system. So again, what do you replace it with?