The 2017 Election Thread

[FJRider]

Fuck up shitforbrains.

another witty comeback ... you're so full of them ...

[TheDemonLord]

Fuck up shitforbrains.

At least now I know what to get you for Christmas.


https://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Pictur...ids+dictionary

[TheDemonLord]

Do women? The answer is also no. So what's the false equivalence?

Every pregnancy, every woman, every man is different, so judge them only on their ability.

Except for one teeny tiny detail.

Women get Pregnant.
Men Don't.

[Graystone]

Except for one teeny tiny detail.

Women get Pregnant.
Men Don't.

So what? Men get prostate cancer, women don't.

Pregnancy is no guarantee of any of those outcomes. Your false equivalence is trying to make out that it does.

[Katman]

Your false equivalence is trying to make out that it does.

Dude, accept the fact that you will never win.

Refer post #1131.

[Woodman]

But JA has now comfortably sown up "The women's vote" for the next three elections ...

Oh yean her spin team are going to be all over this kid. I hope for the kids sake that she doesn't allow it.

[sidecar bob]

Not that it matters, as he wasn't. But yeah, I think the cunts that are the Nats would've stayed in power if JK was still at the helm. Lots of thick as fuck Kiwis seem to like the cunt. Bit like Yanks liking Trump.

No no, you made a mistake, the thick as fuck kiwis had Labour polling at fuck all until several weeks out from the election, then, without any discernible policy changes, miss congeniality takes centre stage & dopey cunts fawn over her & the tables are turned.
Fuck knows.

[Katman]

No no, you made a mistake, the thick as fuck kiwis had Labour polling at fuck all until several weeks out from the election, then, without any discernible policy changes, miss congeniality takes centre stage & dopey cunts fawn over her & the tables are turned.
Fuck knows.

Bitter, much?

[TheDemonLord]

So what? Men get prostate cancer, women don't.

Pregnancy is no guarantee of any of those outcomes. Your false equivalence is trying to make out that it does.

But Women also get Cancer....

Sure, it's no Guarantee, but then riding headfirst into a brick wall at 100 Kph is no guarantee of Death either....

We tend to deal with majority cases though....

[sidecar bob]

Bitter, much?

No, I'm incredibly chilled out & relaxed these days.
You should try not having to work too.

[Graystone]

But Women also get Cancer....

Sure, it's no Guarantee, but then riding headfirst into a brick wall at 100 Kph is no guarantee of Death either....

We tend to deal with majority cases though....

Majority cases? Best you back that one up, history is littered with despots and tyrants persecuting groups of people based on their idea of what represents the 'majority' of cases.

You should probably also be aware, majority is not enough for a conclusive judgment. Not in any sort of enlightened, merit based system anyway.

[Katman]

I'm not being contrary for the sake of it - you may be having a laugh, you may have had a drink - but your posts give off the same stench of totalitarian resentment that fuelled the biggest Genocides in human history.

Majority cases? Best you back that one up, history is littered with despots and tyrants persecuting groups of people based on their idea of what represents the 'majority' of cases.

Fuck me, are you cunts twins?

[Graystone]

Fuck me, are you cunts twins?

Are you that much of a thick cunt to think it wasn't deliberate hyperbole on my part to take the piss out of that specific post?

Go find a forum you can access with crayons or something, there's a good boy.

[Woodman]

No no, you made a mistake, the thick as fuck kiwis had Labour polling at fuck all until several weeks out from the election, then, without any discernible policy changes, miss congeniality takes centre stage & dopey cunts fawn over her & the tables are turned.
Fuck knows.

If crashers celebrity voting is anything to go by, fucken kim kardashian would have got voted in if she had been made leader of the labour party.

[TheDemonLord]

Majority cases? Best you back that one up, history is littered with despots and tyrants persecuting groups of people based on their idea of what represents the 'majority' of cases.

You should probably also be aware, majority is not enough for a conclusive judgment. Not in any sort of enlightened, merit based system anyway.

For sure - but we aren't talking about prejudice against a group are we?

We are talking about the very real Physiological changes that occur in most women through the period of Pregnancy and into the first year of Motherhood.

Changes that are completely absent in the Male of the Species.

Some of those changes could impede the PM from being able to do the job they were elected to do.

That is something that should be of concern and discussed. Now, I can appreciate the viewpoint of giving Jacinda the benefit of the doubt and letting her prove herself - and there is merit to that notion - I'm not calling for her resignation or saying she can't be PM - but I do think a discussion about it is warranted. Especially given the Timing.