I decided to focus on this particular line, as I think it's perhaps the most interesting part.
I have two key comments.
The first is to ask how you know they were unintended?
The second is why do you think that this is a question of Competence?
I've often pointed out that in predominantly left-wing movements (not saying the right doesn't suffer from this, but it was Left Wing institutions that came up with the concept...) - there is often the Useful idiots - people who are otherwise good natured (if not a little naive) who ally themselves with causes that on the surface appear to be good and noble - but are being driven by malevolent actors with an ulterior motive.
Considering Stalinda's political pedigree - namely a Leader of the Socialist youth - what makes you think that the high crime, high costs and breakdown of social cohesion isn't exactly what she is after? Afterall, that's the perfect recipe for a Glorious Revolution - and as a Socialist - whether she says it or not, that is what she wants.
Now, I should point out, I don't think she's quite that clever - but I do think she's being driven by the Philosophy that has that as it's ultimate goal, even if she's not cognizant of where it's taking her.
And as proof of this - I can think of a number of issues where a minority correctly predicted exactly what would happen and pointed to information that was verboten and in some cases suppressed.
Those two facets mean this isn't an honest mistake made by people with good intentions.
Bookmarks