Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36

Thread: Rear-ended

  1. #16
    Join Date
    7th August 2005 - 09:47
    Bike
    1972 HD
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    116
    Blog Entries
    1
    FYI My ride...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 10:28
    Bike
    Goose
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    7,719
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    FYI My ride...
    Hey thats pretty cool mate!
    "Some people are like clouds, once they fuck off, it's a great day!"

  3. #18
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    ... How do you know my bike is not road worthy,
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    So I pull out of a side street and the rear brake jams on.
    Seems to me that your bike being unroadworthy was the primary cause of the accident. The other driver being unable to stop is the secondary cause.

    The best outcome you can hope for is that you each meet your own costs. If it goes to a legal question the fact that your bike had no rego or wof will mean that you will pay for everything, even though you were the victim.
    Time to ride

  4. #19
    Join Date
    3rd June 2005 - 23:06
    Bike
    nun
    Location
    In cloud cookoo land
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    Seems to me that your bike being unroadworthy was the primary cause of the accident. The other driver being unable to stop is the secondary cause.

    The best outcome you can hope for is that you each meet your own costs. If it goes to a legal question the fact that your bike had no rego or wof will mean that you will pay for everything, even though you were the victim.
    are you a lawyer too huh??!! well blow me.


    :slap:

  5. #20
    Join Date
    29th March 2007 - 19:23
    Bike
    Suzuki Bandit 250
    Location
    Masterton
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    FYI My ride...
    Thats a groovy lookin ride dude!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    1st November 2007 - 05:13
    Bike
    2007 Vespa GT250
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2
    if they go on about no rego and no Wof tell them you cant get a rego without a wof, and you were on the way to the wof station - you are allowed to ride to a wof station if it has run out

  7. #22
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    I am not your mate, never will be and don't want to be.

    It had no warrant cause I just got the thing going.

    Why did you reply anyway. Just to make my anger boil more, How do you know my bike is not road worthy, And how do you get it road worthy without testing it before a warrant.

    Please, I don't want scorn, So your comment is a Nil like you.

    Thanks for the other CONSTRUCTIVE comments
    It is constructive. That's how the law would see it. I won't pass judgement on whether it's ethically/morally correct, but that's just how it would be seen if you went to court.

    By the way, bare metal tank looks wicked

    Basically, anybody following behind you has to follow at a safe distance so they can stop in time. If you ever hit anybody up the arse, you're at fault. However there are one or two exceptions to that, and I think you've entered a grey area where those exceptions apply. If somebody pulls into your lane or pulls in front of you so your following distance is reduced before you can adjust, then you're not at fault if you rear-end them. So if you pulled in front of her so there wasn't much room in-between, then it's your fault.

    I think if you went to court you'd be fucked because of the un-roadworthy condition anyway.

    Hope the repairs to your bike aren't too hefty.

  8. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    Yes I have got anger problems.

    But my bike is not a piece of shit, and I resent anyone implying it.

    I spent hours of work into it, and I love it like you guys must love yours.

    Edit- Yeah bring on the Red bling. Please leave your name by it too
    No one was implying that your bike is a piece of shit. They were just pointing out that FACTS. No rego, no wof, and your brakes "jammed" on. Despite the fact that she hit you, the no rego no wof thing "IS" questionable. And definately doesn't work in your favour.

    I'm sorry to hear about your accident none the less, and I hope you get things sorted, with the best outcome.


  9. #24
    Join Date
    9th November 2005 - 18:45
    Bike
    2005 Z750S
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Mom View Post
    Of course you would say that... wine is better!
    He's had some.
    Measure once, cut twice. Practice makes perfect.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    If you pulled out from a give way sign and got rear-ended you're at blame by default!
    If it wasn't at a give way sign and you're turning and she's going straight through, then you still have to give way.

    The road code states that if you are to give way you're not allowed to pull out if it causes any motorists, that you're at to give way to, to change their speed or direction (i.e. braking or taking evasive action). Unless she was speeding excessively and you can prove that, then my guess is you have no chance of being found without fault.

    As for being found at fault for rear-ending someone - I very much doubt you'd get away cleanly with slamming on your brakes for no other reason than to teach that "tailgating MOFO" a lesson and thus causing a crash.

    As for the other parts:

    No WOF - NOT OK! (and if this caused the situation to arise I don't think she could ever been found at fault.)
    No Rego - NOT OK!

    Best of luck with it, learn to contain that anger and go about it like a man.
    Nice bike btw!

    "Life sucks, get a fucking helmet!" (And if you threw yours down in anger, you might need to replace it - just some friendly advice.)
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  11. #26
    Join Date
    1st March 2007 - 11:30
    Bike
    2014 R1200 GS, 2007 DR 650
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    1,473
    I thought that you were allowed to operate an unwarrented vehicle for the "express purpose of obtaining a warrent."
    I KNOW that you can't register the vehicle unless it is warrented.
    If he was taking it for a test ride immediately prior to obtaining a warrent, for the express purpose of obtaining a warrent and can somehow prove it, does that not get him off the hook for both warrent and rego?
    I may not be as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I always was.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    You are not doing yourself any favours by posting this here...
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  13. #28
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by selectedgrub View Post
    I spent hours of work into it, and I love it like you guys must love yours.
    Obviously without checking the brakes properly in the driveway or similar. I love my bike enough to ensure essentials like brakes are reliably operational before venturing onto the road.
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Bass View Post
    I thought that you were allowed to operate an unwarranted vehicle for the "express purpose of obtaining a warrant"
    That's correct.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bass View Post
    If he was taking it for a test ride immediately prior to obtaining a warrent, for the express purpose of obtaining a warrant and can somehow prove it, does that not get him off the hook for both warrent and rego?
    No - the exemption is only for the purpose of taking it to a place of repair or inspection, not for a test ride. And given this particular silly fuckers shithead attitude, he'd never be believed anyway.
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    27th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    Nood Hyosung 2fiddy
    Location
    -36.7814, 174.6527
    Posts
    1,239
    Sounds like if it went to court you'd lose it again then her lawyer could finish you off by claiming you have a tendancy to be rash? They don't care what your bike is etc they see no WOF or rego and brake locked on (how does your brake lock on? You should have spent some of those hours of love on places that count?) If you don't want comments don't post in an open internmet forum, you must have real issues if Matt TG's comment got you so pissed off. He offered help and said he wanted things to go well for you. Throwning your helmet into the ground? dick.
    I'm selling my new riding gear!! Only worn a few times get a deal Kiwibikers!!
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...53#post1414653

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •