The key to good braking is reaction time(time taken to react), AFTER brain gets the message you do need to brake, and actually braking. At 100 km/hour about 28 meters is covered a second. Thats about 2.8 meters every 10ths of a second. So at a following distance of say 10 meters, and the vehicle in front STOPS(ie. hits something), you have about 2 and 1/2 tenths of a second before YOU are there. How goods YOUR reaction time ??? Are YOUR brakes up to it ???
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
The very stickiest bike tyres have been tested at just under 1G braking performance. That is equal to 38 m from 100 kmh.
So the data you give for supercars is in the right order. I have yet to see a bike decellerate at more than 1G unless there is some other outside inluence. Last year I stopped at 2.5G and I'm still waiting for the surgery as a result.
Time to ride
It does help if YOU stop at the same speed as the BIKE.
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
But you weren't braking were you ???
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Even IF a bike can out brake a car, can you?
It really is a skill that requires a bit of practice to get right and particularly to make it a natural reaction in an emergency situation.
One tip, which will no doubt be contested, don't cover your brake with 2 fingers. All or nothing.
Why everyone is rattling on about ABS I am not sure. ABS on most cars and all motorcycles (with the exception of some BMWs) increases stopping distances. Sure it allows for control, which is nice if there is an out, but if the extra few metres you loose with ABS means life and death, it sucks big time.
Quite right. ABS is designed to retain steering control of the vehicle and as a trade off stopping distance is slightly increased. That is the whole point. That you retain car control. It allows the driver to stand on the brake pedal without risk of locking up. A lot of drivers don not realise this and follow too close thinking they are safe.
ABS does not work so well for bikes because of the changing contact patch on cornering. Some systems get round this by detecting the lean angle and disabling themselves for a few seconds mid corner and rearming when upright.
You're not that dumb. You know about the gravitational acceleration constant, how '1G' is defined, right? That's about as good as bike tyres get in terms of accelerations they can keep sticking under.
Working out what acceleration a particular stopping distance equates to is straightforward, and the stopping distance you propose equates to six times the braking performance of bike tyres.
No, I don't think you can stop in a bike length from 60kph. That's pure bollocks. And Jantar was being generous with his 'bike length' - would you prefer your statement to sound even stupider if we lower that number?
...
Actually, come to think of it, I nominate you for the 'King of the Shyte Talkers' award.
Who do you plan on borrowing a bike from to show him with?
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Another factor to think about its a sportsbike (and others, I guess) needs to load up the front tyre to swing some weight on it before actually biting in to the real braking, perhaps this means that a car may initially outbrake a bike by alot but possibly be reeled in a bit afterwards depending on bike/car/rider/driver.
Just an idea.
Heinz Varieties
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks