Antonie Dixon re-trial - machete slasher fu*kwitt

**alanzs** · 26th June 2008, 22:09

Assuming he is guilty. He deserves nothing less than what he did to his victims. No excuses accepted, no leniency given; off with his head.

**firefighter** · 27th June 2008, 12:21

Originally Posted by alanzs

Assuming he is guilty. He deserves nothing less than what he did to his victims. No excuses accepted, no leniency given; off with his head.

Yep he's definately guilty....no question.

**glice** · 27th June 2008, 13:17

I'm with putting him down. and any other worthless shits that do similar crimes. eye for an eye.

**Patrick** · 27th June 2008, 13:39

Originally Posted by mowgli

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell

Think they are trying the insanity reason as opposed to the guilty as sin murderous intent... Lock him away with the criminally insane

- he will become one of them after a while... some real weird ones in secure psyche wards that he will be associating with - ones that will chop ya nuts off with a rusty tin can bacause the voices told him to...

Originally Posted by Mr Merde

By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either

Quite right - no one made them do it....

Originally Posted by Forest

The real reason for the retrial can be summed up in two words...

Legal Aid.

"Hitting the nail on the head" is the phrase I believe you are after...

Originally Posted by oldrider

Years ago it used to be an excuse if you were pissed and had an accident while driving a vehicle.

The law was changed but traffic officers of the day had no power of arrest.

The MOT and Police were amalgamated to accommodate this, if my memory is correct.

There were other economies claimed as well of course but the above was the driving force.

They only had limited powers of arrest - they could lock up drunks and disqualified drivers, but not those arses that assaulted them.

Other economics - maybe, but the main factor was that there are few contries left in the world where Police and Traffic were completely seperate law enforcement entities. Hence the merger, back in 1992. It won't change back for those same economic reasons.....

**Danboy** · 27th June 2008, 15:22

Definitely eye for an eye. He seemed to like sharp blades and chopping things off, how about he gets the same done to him? His victim had no say in it, so neither should he. Fuck, fraudsters get harsher treatment than murderers these days!! System's all gone to fuck. Too PC for my liking. Once you've committed a crime of this magnitude and it's 100% proven you committed said crime, you should have no rights, therefore no legal aid and no say.

**Skyryder** · 27th June 2008, 22:05

Originally Posted by oldrider

The MOT and Police were amalgamated to accommodate this, if my memory is correct.

It was John Bank's way of increasing the police numbers. He had made and election promise on this but never informed the public on what he was going to do. Both the police and the MOT were against the move, but since when did Banks listen to anybody but his own mouth.

Skyryder

**Maffoo** · 28th June 2008, 22:04

i know one of the girls he sliced up

& he's definitely guilty

**young1** · 29th June 2008, 11:50

His victims never got a chance so why should this a$$hole!

**spudchucka** · 17th July 2008, 06:22

Does anybody actually believe the crap this guy is spouting from the dock?

He is f*%ked in the head if he thinks that performance is going to save his sorry arse but not in a way that makes him not guilty of murder.

**carver** · 17th July 2008, 06:52

Originally Posted by firefighter

The fuckers guilty why a retrial????!!!!! what for??? put the piece of shit down for fucks sake, and forget this second chance shit, his victims haven't had one and iv'e manged to never slice anyone up on a "p" fuelled rampage!!!

you quite clearly dont know shit.

the girls gave him the drugs
the warehouse was used to strip stolen cars
the girls sneaked in a larger dose, and it was not just meth!
they kinda got what was coming to them

**awayatc** · 17th July 2008, 07:24

Originally Posted by carver

you quite clearly dont know shit.

Is that an expert opinion?....Glad to hear from somebody who knows shit....

**Qkchk:Me** · 17th July 2008, 07:34

Originally Posted by spudchucka

Does anybody actually believe the crap this guy is spouting from the dock?

He is f*%ked in the head if he thinks that performance is going to save his sorry arse but not in a way that makes him not guilty of murder.

But god told him to do it........

Always gotta blame someone else but themselves.

**Skyryder** · 17th July 2008, 11:48

Originally Posted by Qkchk

But god told him to do it........

Always gotta blame someone else but themselves.

He'd be more believable if he claimed the Devil spoke to him. All he's gota do is play the TBN channel to the jury for proof. Now there's an idea may be he could get 'Joyce' as an expert witness on the subject of the Devil. She's coming out here soon to preach.

Skyryder

**peasea** · 17th July 2008, 13:57

Originally Posted by carver

you quite clearly dont know shit.

the girls gave him the drugs
the warehouse was used to strip stolen cars
the girls sneaked in a larger dose, and it was not just meth!
they kinda got what was coming to them

The girls gave him the drugs: He chose to take them.
The warehouse was used to strip stiolen cars: Put them all in jail.
The girls sneaked in a larger dose etc: Lucky him.
They kinda got what was coming to them: You live by the sword etc etc....

I happen to know an ex-copper who worked on that case and he's convinced there's not a lot wrong with the insides of this cock's skull, rather he's playing everyone like fiddles.

When you take illicit drugs you're taking a risk because the dosage varies wildly (in my experience) and there is also a risk of infection in certain circumstances. I doubt anyone forced this twat to take drugs and to use drugs (including alcohol) as an excuse for any crime is crap. If this lot was involved in a car theft/stripping ring (or ignoring it while they were on the premises) then I say jail the lot of them. It's too easy to get away with car theft in NZ, it sucks. Generally speaking a motor vehicle is a persons second biggest asset, sometimes their only asset. To lose it is often devastaing.

Sneaking drugs into somebody's drink, meal, syringe, whatever (or adding to already unkown doses) is bloody dangerous and could kill. If those girls did that then lock them up for that alone.

Why this trial has gone ahead I don't know but I sincerely hope it culminates in a bunch of cell time for those who deserve it.