Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Honda CX400 Brake Declaration

  1. #1
    Join Date
    19th May 2007 - 13:37
    Bike
    Honda CX400
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    27
    Blog Entries
    1

    Honda CX400 Brake Declaration

    My 1983 Honda CX400 has been off the road for 9 years and needs a Brake Declaration as part of the registration process. Aparantly I can fill in the form myself but I don't know what the OEM Specifications are. Can anyone help:
    FRONT
    ..............thickness.........OEM Spec.............Ovality/Runout
    Pads.............................................. .................n/a
    Linings........................................... ..................n/a
    Disc(s)
    Drum

    REAR
    Pads.............................................. ...................n/a
    Linings........................................... ....................n/a
    Disc(s)
    Drum

    It has a disc on the front and drum on the rear. I have been told that the bike is the same as the CX500.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    23rd January 2007 - 13:15
    Bike
    CRF Motard and The Corporal!
    Location
    Land of the Poseurs
    Posts
    295
    Normally with the re-vin process the brake declaration has to go through a bike shop and the bike must be delivered to the vin station immediately afterwards or within a hour of it taking place. At least thats what happened when I did my last bike a year ago.

    If you have a good local shop they should do it for you for next to nothing. Good luck
    Get rid of those NANA knickers, and FIGHTER it!



    You can pick your nose and you can pick your friends, but you cant eat your friends!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    1st October 2005 - 23:01
    Bike
    Niftyfifty
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    570
    you don't need to do this if your bike was REGed in NZ before 1991

  4. #4
    Join Date
    19th May 2007 - 13:37
    Bike
    Honda CX400
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    27
    Blog Entries
    1

    CX400 Brake Declaration

    Thanks Guys,
    That's very interesting. My bike was registered before 1991 but the registration lapsed without being put on hold. Does the 1991 rule still apply? Is it somewhere on the web so I can point the VTNZ guys to it when they say otherwise?
    JC

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Year of first NZ registration. You don't need one. But a shit load of compliance places don't know the rules. (yeah. I know. Compliance place doesn't know the rule s. Duh)
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    19th May 2007 - 13:37
    Bike
    Honda CX400
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    27
    Blog Entries
    1

    Brake Declaration

    I sent an e-mail to VTNZ and they said you are correct! Not only that, they sent a page from the entry certification manual that shows you are correct. Amazing! Who says you don't get good service from Government organizations? And what great guys you find on the "Kiwi Biker Forum"!
    JC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    1st October 2005 - 23:01
    Bike
    Niftyfifty
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    570
    Quote Originally Posted by autobatch View Post
    I sent an e-mail to VTNZ and they said you are correct! Not only that, they sent a page from the entry certification manual that shows you are correct. Amazing! Who says you don't get good service from Government organizations? And what great guys you find on the "Kiwi Biker Forum"!
    JC
    Get ready to throw the book back at them

  8. #8
    Join Date
    5th April 2008 - 14:52
    Bike
    Honda 1982 CX500; 1986 VFR700
    Location
    Levin
    Posts
    42
    I've just done my '1982 CX500 last week. Had'nt had a WOF or Reg for about 6 years. I was informed that because it was not pre 1980 it did not have to have a brake compliance, so all I had to do is pay $145.00 for what turned out to be not much more than a standard WOF. I also had to re register and get new plates. Basically fairly easy - just an expensive donation to the establishment.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th January 2005 - 18:09
    Bike
    95 honda cbr900rr 05 zx6rr 89gsxr750
    Location
    papatoetoe
    Posts
    273
    Why do pre '91 not need a brake declaration but later does ? Seems to me the older the bike the more worn the bits .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    CCos 1991 was when they required it at point of entry. Older models, data maybe doesn't exist
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  11. #11
    Join Date
    30th September 2007 - 12:16
    Bike
    1989 Yamaha SR250
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    65

    Bloody Brake Declarations

    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    Year of first NZ registration. You don't need one. But a shit load of compliance places don't know the rules. (yeah. I know. Compliance place doesn't know the rule s. Duh)
    This is still the case, after a few emails and a long time spent on the phone with NZTA trying to convince them to tell VTNZ it wasn't required, after multiple people told me I would need it done...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    9th October 2008 - 15:52
    Bike
    RSV4RR, M109R, ZX10R
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    6,165
    Blog Entries
    1
    Not needed on pre 1991 which was the date that almost all bikes had a min thickness on the discs.

    They will need be in a condition suitable for a wof though. Big lip or warp that will fail a standard wof is no good.
    I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •