Oh, no, I crashed - and apparently I am at fault...?

[Katman]

So.. you only listen to those who inbreed? It all becomes clear..

You're none too bright, are you?

[Irontusk]

You're none too bright, are you?

Maybe you can't type and don't know it.. but your wording says not to listen to Scandanavians because they don't inbreed.

[FJRider]

1. Rider should be able to stop all the time, (well... wouldnt then bike wrecking business be a nightmare if that was possible)

Responce: In a perfect world yes... but in todays world thats not the case.

but when a car fails to stop it doesnt mean that no matter what has happened that car/bike is at fault. This is just not right. (I hope that valids a serious enough responce)

Yes the rider should...thats the law.

True...live with it.

The car did stop...you didn't....fault is for the courts to decide. Not you. Get over it.
The courts aren't always "right"...but thats life.

(serious... not even close)

[niero]

A serious enough response?

Fuck me - you're kidding, right?

P.S. Don't listen to Mikkel - Scandanavians are known for inbreeding. Long winter nights, you know.

Eh, dont swing that way, and no I am not kidding

Extrimist, Sexiest, and now racist... what else can you add to the list pal? I am starting to feel the need to close this thread before it will trully become (if not already) offencive.

[JMemonic]

P.S. Don't listen to Mikkel - Scandanavians aren't known for inbreeding. Long winter nights, you know.

Can you say Aryan breeding programme, is that what you expect Scandinavians to be doing, you really are odd Katman.

Are you confusing Scandinavia with the hillbilly's of the US, or are you from the west coast ?? I have heard rumours that in some areas there that is common practice, although that might just be a religious compound over there.

[Mikkel]

So.. you only listen to those who inbreed? It all becomes clear..

Eh, dont swind that way, and no I am not kidding

Extrimist, Sexiest, and now racist... what else can you add to the list pal? I am starting to feel the need to close this thread before it will trully become (if not already) offencive.

Please stop quoting the idiot - it kinda makes having him on ignore pointless.

And don't just take my word regarding the idiot label - please make sure to admire the evidence at hand for all of it's clarity. (what has already been quoted in this thread should be enough to drive that nail firmly home I think)

[dipshit]

Responce: In a perfect world yes... but in todays world thats not the case. You will not be able to stop if that same poor child ran on to the road,

The reason someone mentioned being able to stop if a child ran out onto the road... was making the point that you have to allow room for any vehicle you are following in case *they* see something that you don't (like the child running out onto the road) and they need to slam on the anchors. You don't want to go slamming into the back of them.

You should never assume that the car you are following isn't going to all of a sudden jump on the brakes for no apparent reason. They may have seen something that you haven't seen. And people do go - shit, that's the turn off!

[Katman]

Extrimist, Sexiest, and now racist... what else can you add to the list pal?

Give me a minute.

[FJRider]

Give me a minute.

You can tell us, all that you are an expert on.... in half that...