Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: I dynoed my '09 ninja 250r today, but the figures dont seem right?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    25th August 2008 - 18:48
    Bike
    2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250
    Location
    no mans land
    Posts
    58

    I dynoed my '09 ninja 250r today, but the figures dont seem right?

    I did a dyno run today before I put my full yoshi pipe and jet kit on. The end figures are: max HP 31.2 which is at the rear wheel which is 6hp more than everyone elses. The torque figure shows almost 45FtLb which should be around 18FtLb for everyone elses. these are way out. Have I got a very special bike or is the dyno a peice of shit and a waste of money??
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	torque.JPG 
Views:	119 
Size:	28.9 KB 
ID:	106326  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    13th August 2004 - 20:45
    Bike
    Gixxer
    Location
    Palmy
    Posts
    3,632
    No idea about the torque, but the hp sounds about what id expect.
    Dyno runs are far from a waste. Did you get a before and after run done?
    If you are doing work to the bike and dynoing as you go just make sure you use the same dyno. It just shows you if the work your doing is improving your bike or not.
    Motorcycing is not a hobby, It is a way of life!

    Missed forever! NEVER FORGOTTEN!!
    LIVE ON MY FRIENDS!

    Friends dont let friends ride Hyosungs

  3. #3
    Join Date
    25th August 2008 - 18:48
    Bike
    2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250
    Location
    no mans land
    Posts
    58
    this is the "before" run, ie I havnt done any work on the bike yet. The pipe should be hear about tuesday and il do a run with that fitted. I will then do another run after that with the jet kit in. The dyno also has a Air/fuel graph so I know after I put the pipe on if I need to fit the jet or not. Also does anyone think that torque figure is a wee bit flat. Shouldnt it be going up similar to the HP??

  4. #4
    Join Date
    19th May 2008 - 23:24
    Bike
    kwikasfuki ninja
    Location
    Aukland
    Posts
    401
    where is 45lb of tourque? all i see is around 22...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    25th August 2008 - 18:48
    Bike
    2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250
    Location
    no mans land
    Posts
    58
    The hp is on the left which is probably what your looking at, the torque is on the right and KPH is on the bottom

  6. #6
    Join Date
    13th August 2004 - 20:45
    Bike
    Gixxer
    Location
    Palmy
    Posts
    3,632
    NA, The torque curve looks ok. Its still just a 250cc twin mate, so wont have a huge amount of power/torque.
    Will be interesting to see what kind of increase you get after doing the work.
    Motorcycing is not a hobby, It is a way of life!

    Missed forever! NEVER FORGOTTEN!!
    LIVE ON MY FRIENDS!

    Friends dont let friends ride Hyosungs

  7. #7
    Join Date
    25th August 2008 - 18:48
    Bike
    2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250
    Location
    no mans land
    Posts
    58
    No but after having alook at wikipedia it says the bike is making 14FtLb and the rear wheels and mine is making 45FtLb. just wondering if the dyno is crap or using a wrong setting or something or have I got a really strong bike.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    12th September 2006 - 01:15
    Bike
    BMW R1200RT
    Location
    Ponga Hill
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by cameltoe View Post
    No but after having alook at wikipedia it says the bike is making 14FtLb and the rear wheels and mine is making 45FtLb. just wondering if the dyno is crap or using a wrong setting or something or have I got a really strong bike.
    Dynos are notoriously difficult to calibrate and shouldn't be used for absolute performance measurements.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    What gear was the bike in topping out at only 100km/hr? Has that got something to do with it because lower gear, higher torque at the wheel. There'd have to be some calculation to relate that back to torque at the crank wouldn't there?
    Cheers

    Merv

  10. #10
    Join Date
    20th July 2008 - 19:09
    Bike
    LTR450
    Location
    DUNEDIN
    Posts
    94
    to find out if you 250 is an exceptionally torquey beast you would need to compare the results against another 250 the same as yours on the same dyno, being tested the same way under the same atmospheric conditions.


    Post your 'after' results to see how much of a difference they make.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    Random guess here.
    The reduction effect of the primary drive, gearbox and sprockets has the effect of multiplying torque.
    The values are relative to the rear wheel, not the engine.

    If so, the torque values are useless when compared to a bike that has been tested on a dyno which uses the engine RPM on the X plot.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by cameltoe View Post
    I did a dyno run today before I put my full yoshi pipe and jet kit on. The end figures are: max HP 31.2 which is at the rear wheel which is 6hp more than everyone elses. The torque figure shows almost 45FtLb which should be around 18FtLb for everyone elses. these are way out. Have I got a very special bike or is the dyno a peice of shit and a waste of money??

    Ya dynoed a 250?????? WHY???

    I got 73HP from A STOCK 1450cc and I still get around the country OK two-up- and using bugger-all gear changes.

    AND get 58mpg.

    (you metric types can figure it out yourselves)
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    27th March 2006 - 10:29
    Bike
    KTM 1190 Adv R and a bunch of dirties
    Location
    Burglary capital of Unzud
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by scumdog View Post
    I got 73HP from A STOCK 1450cc and I still get around the country OK two-up- and using bugger-all gear changes.
    AND get 58mpg.

    (you metric types can figure it out yourselves)
    ...sure that is approximately 88.484 428 937 cubic inches
    Quote Originally Posted by Albert
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

  14. #14
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 22:07
    Bike
    GSF1200sk3, DR650k6
    Location
    outside chch
    Posts
    1,022
    Blog Entries
    5
    i dont know enough about the dyno set ups, but surely its more relevant to showpeak HP and REVS , the chart i see seems to lack what i would want to know, that being how the hp curve goes in relation to revolutions.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    25th August 2008 - 18:48
    Bike
    2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250
    Location
    no mans land
    Posts
    58
    showing hp Vs RPM is more difficult to graph, I was in 4th gear. but surely the manufacturer is going to put the most torque it produces regardless of what gear its in, it makes it more appealing to buyers, Ive never heard of any other stock making 45FtLb torque. There is a youtube clip with a ninja 250r on a dyno and that makes 13FtLb torque. thats quite a big difference

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •