Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Wearing top-name motorcycle helmet could cost you thousands, say testers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    29th December 2007 - 18:54
    Bike
    GN250!!!!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    855

    Wearing top-name motorcycle helmet could cost you thousands, say testers

    Wearing a crash helmet which failed to score the maximum five stars in new safety tests could mean less compensation after a crash, according to experts.

    Insurers will argue it was your choice to wear only a three-or-four-star helmet and that you are therefore partly responsible for the extent of any injuries, it was claimed.

    Helmets to achieve fewer than five stars in new Government-approved tests include trusted prestige brands such Arai, Shoei, AGV and Suomy.

    Arai’s £300 GP5x got five stars in the so called SHARP tests but the firm’s £450 range-topping RX-7 scored only three, while its £200 Condor got just two. Shoei’s £330 XR-1000 and Suomy’s £400 Extreme also gained three stars.

    Meanwhile five-star helmets include Lazer’s £60 LZ6, Bell’s £130 M1 and HJC’s £249 HQ-1.

    A leading independent helmet testing laboratory claimed solicitors would seize upon the new star ratings to argue riders in low-rated helmets deserved a smaller payout after a crash, even if the accident was not their fault. Paul Walker, of Head Protection Evaluations (HPE), which tests to the U.S. recognised helmet standard, said it would be argued riders could have helped prevent their own injuries by choosing a five-star helmet instead.

    HPE’s Paul Walker said the testing house was already frequently contacted by solicitors seeking advice in cases where it was argued a motorcyclist “should have been wearing a better helmet”. He said the number of similar cases was growing, indicating solicitors and insurers were looking more closely at helmet quality, and the star rating would be prove perfect ammunition.

    He said: “I expect those cases to come along in due course, when certain clever lawyers working on behalf of insurers say you chose a one-star helmet so your claim for half a million can be reduced to £100,000.”

    Arai UK’s John Wakefield said: “We’ll be asking HPE to keep us informed on this because it’s obviously very important.”

    Steve Clifford, of Shoei’s UK distributor, said: “It’s a definite concern.”
    We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
    Running over the same old ground.
    What have you found? The same old fears.
    Wish you were here. QWQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    Interesting news articles.

    But I can't help thinking though..... Is Bob taking a holiday from his usual duty or something???
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikern1mpho View Post
    A leading independent helmet testing laboratory claimed solicitors would seize upon the new star ratings
    Sounds like they missed out on some contract. Just the doublespeak count sets alarmbells off for me.

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd June 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2008 Suzuki GSX650F
    Location
    Just over there
    Posts
    2,708
    Quote Originally Posted by bobsmith View Post
    Interesting news articles.

    But I can't help thinking though..... Is Bob taking a holiday from his usual duty or something???


    True reason for not coming up with this? It is a direct lift from Motor Cycle News - as I find my news stuff for other sources as well as KB, I leave the MCN stuff well alone, as - lets face it - if it is on the MCN site it is pretty well publicised!

    (Quite aside from MCN not letting the truth get in the way of a good story... )
    http://www.motobke.co.uk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    What a load of shit.
    Not directed at the messenger of course, but the twat in the article.
    He is simply trying to legitimise his test as "the" standard instead of the Snell tests.

    There has been a lot of argument about helmet testing standards, thiers is simply one more.

    Have there been any case where drivers of less safe cars have had their payouts reduced because of it?
    Indeed if car was a possibility, why would not the insurer simply refuse to pay for any motorcycle accident and say they should have had a car instead as they are safer.

    I think this is just one more reason to be highly sceptical of the new star rating system.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    And reading this helps my overwhelming anxiety how?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    7th December 2007 - 12:09
    Bike
    Valkyrie 1500 ,HD softail, BMW r1150r
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    2,144
    If my helmets fails in a crash.....

    Well if it ever will I don't think I will be worrying about that...

    Plus I'd see plenty of stars then...surely more then 5
    Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    13th June 2008 - 21:31
    Bike
    1997 Harley Sportster 'S' and BOTB sx
    Location
    Otago
    Posts
    131
    If my helmet fails I don't think I will be quibbling about how many stars as I will be amongst them. Get one that fits and does the basic job of protecting your nut against a wee bang against the ground. Who the heck crash tests them on their head anyway!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,239
    Blog Entries
    1
    Their ratings list looks rather odd. I'd like to see a critique of their testing methods. There is some information about how they test on their site but it didn't mean that much to me.

    Judging by what they have published so far I wouldn't be basing my next purchase on their ratings...
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  10. #10
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    All those test have one major flaw - note of them rate how cool the graphics are.

    WTF


  11. #11
    Join Date
    23rd June 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2008 Suzuki GSX650F
    Location
    Just over there
    Posts
    2,708
    Quote Originally Posted by pritch008 View Post
    Their ratings list looks rather odd. I'd like to see a critique of their testing methods. There is some information about how they test on their site but it didn't mean that much to me.

    Judging by what they have published so far I wouldn't be basing my next purchase on their ratings...
    From the little I do know, the Sharp tests cover two types of test; direct impact and rotational.

    Impact? Works the same way as other impact tests - a heavy, pointy thing is dropped onto the helmet.

    The rotational? Don't know a lot about how they do it, but they test the helmet to ensure that it doesn't slip/slide round the head I think - and also that the helmet does not 'stick' to the road. Apparantly one of the major injury issues is that the rider's head gets pulled round when hitting the road due to friction, twisting the neck and causing injuries.

    Why they don't provide more accurate/informative information on the site, I have no idea.

    Been thinking about this a little more - and I'm not sure someone could 'downgrade' your claim on the basis of the Sharp rating scheme. The legal requirement in the UK isn't Sharp rating, but the EU standard 22.05 - so if a helmet meets that standard, then it is legal for use on the road. The Sharp ratings are not a legal standard - well not yet anyway - so in terms of insurance, if your kit meets a legal standard, then it is fit for use and I'd say the helmet makers would be keen to provide assistance if this went to court to ensure that remains so!
    http://www.motobke.co.uk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    So after car crash tests... do cage drivers get less of an insurance payout if the vehicles get a poor evaluation ???
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    28th July 2008 - 14:43
    Bike
    GSA & WR
    Location
    Auckland, Swanson
    Posts
    1,877
    Think I go by the current ratings/standards......Oh and the fact that the guys that ride bikes foookin fast for a living (WSB, GP etc) decide to wear them instead of $250 (project funding ) brands. You pay your money and make your choice, me! I have an Arai RX7 I bought it because it was comfortable (I have an Arai shaped head), It has a good rep (seen pleanty of racers get of wearing them and get up and walk away.....inc myself) and because I could afford one.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    What a load of shit.
    Not directed at the messenger of course, but the twat in the article.
    He is simply trying to legitimise his test as "the" standard instead of the Snell tests.
    I don't like the Snell tests myself. I prefer the "softer" conditions of almost all the other testing systems.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    I don't like the Snell tests myself. I prefer the "softer" conditions of almost all the other testing systems.
    Sure, your preference, and I am not saying one is better than the other.
    I can see arguments for both ways and am no expert.

    However I do become a little suspicious when one resorts to baseless scaremongering in order to establish credibility.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •