I lived in sydney in the mis 80's and there were two ducati shops. I used to go on lots of bike rallys on my 900SD. Not much interest there at the time in bikes of 600cc, Pantahs were around but not really concidered to seriously by the SS types....in fact they used to poke fun at me for having a Darmah...or Drama as they refered to it. The only Ducati worth owning seemed to be a 900 ss or earlier.Not my opinion, just what I observed.
( Must have affected me as I don't even know what a F1 600TT is, and I have two Ducatis.....)
The ducati was ultimately more successful than suzuki's TLR and Honda's VTR. So they must have been doing something right.
75 degrees.....bloody crowded between the cylinders, I'm still looking for the 6mm allen key I dropped into the 990 2 weeks ago! The 75 degree twins also vibrate more than the 90 degree, I have to admit I loved the smooth power of the ducati.
Otherwise, it's all about tradition as others have said, the original design was based on good engineering principles, primary balance and the control of valve float at high revs (desmodromics) with the need to control the temperature of the rear cylinder, don't forget that a long wheelbase wasn't frowned on in the 70's, steering head angles were nearer 27 degress than 22 degrees then so there was plenty of space for a long motor.
Their persistance with these basic features is all about tradition, look at the effort they go to change valve angles and heads on the front cylinder in the 916/996 series motors in an effort to maintain clearance from the front wheel.
I would'nt buy an in line four Ducati.
Ah now to compare like this you would need to single out one similar sized Ducati and compare its sales with Suzukis & Hondas V-twins over the same period. I say this as it's unreasonable to compare all Ducatis range with a single Suzuki & Honda model out of a large range.
Plus the TL morphed into the SV.
I was thinking about this a bit after reading the post yesterday.
I kept comparing the Ducati engine layout with Porsche engine layout - that rear engined car really was daft for a sports model - at one stage they were even loading up the front end with a hell of a lot of weight (lead?) in a attempt to keep the front down.
Porsche stayed with the rear engine and eventually sorted out the handling to the point where it is widely regarding as one of the nicest handling sports cars about.
Ducati is the same. However I suspect the primary balance plays a big part too.
And yes I do remember them tilting the V angle back recently to give more clearance in the front end.
The KTM RC8 is 90 degree.
Apriia run 90 in their new 750 engine
Hinda has 52 degrees in the 700 Translapper
I had the use of a 600 Pantah at the same time as I owned a 900 Darmah, the Pantah on a windy road would run away from the Darmahs, I didn't ever get to run it against a 900SS but I think the result would be similar
Going from the Darmah to the Pantah was like getting out of a truck and into a sports car
Yea yea well aware of that but what i was pondering was why when they no longer needed to have there engine at such an angle didnt they sit it up to reduce length and attend to the rear weight bias as it was seen,theres no wrong/right answer i guess am just interested to see what people thought.
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
As I hooned a long late this afternoon on my IL4, I remembered a magazine article I have a home somewhere (relatively recent) with a short column quoting Ducatis engine designer saying they are working on the next generation engine as the present design has pretty much reached its limit (presumably in a road going form keeping it warrantable).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks