
Originally Posted by
Anthrax
In the end race results mean nothing on the road......
...mmm, and thats pretty important for many of us. I believe it was in Bike some years ago that an R1100S did the lot of them (yes, a beemer) in a real-world test over 100+ miles of pommie A/B roads, one of the Duc's coming in 2nd (998/999 from memory), one reason was the need for a gas stop on some of the bikes :-). Ahh, ya gotta love that telelever. So that was why I was keen on the ST4S , it had that Duc howl + it really could compete...it was just a few years after Gary Egan won the Iron Butt in the US on an ST4....and then there's the Multistrada..sweet.
If you've been price-conditioned by BMW, a Duc looks quite reasonable! If you've drunk the BMW-reliability Kool-aid, then a Duc approaches "solid". Neither brand is cost-justified in comparo with japanese brands, therefore it must be "something else"....if you buy one there is obviously something else for you, if you don't then even if the "something else" exists, it just ain't worth it. Who can blame either party? It just astonishes and annoys some people that others will pay the difference, then try and justify it with apparently nonsense justifications.
Perhaps the Harley crowd is right...if you don't like it, you don't understand.
Ralph
...the older I get, the faster I was...
Bookmarks