
Originally Posted by
HenryDorsetCase
I think you are wrong.
Your $200 on the tag example might or might not require the store to honour the price. If they advertised the goods at the lower price, and you responded then they renege, then not honouring it breaches the fair trading act. I think i read somewhere that its a reasonable consumer test as well: example if the advert is for an Aston Martin DB7 NZ new with 25000km on the clock and the ad says $17500. Its pretty obvious that is an error and theyve left a zero off, and you'll look like nothing but a prat if you march in with a cheque for $17500. Your offer won't be accepted. In a shop, with the price tag, offer and acceptance occurs at the register: you offer to purchase the goods when you get there, and the shop accepts your offer at the price agreed. If they dont accept your offer, (oi, nar, its got the wrong ticket on it matey, did you do that?) then no contract, and no breach. You'll see that there are two separate but related areas of law going on: one is general consumer protection legislation, the other the venerable law of contract.
also interesting is the fact that none of the consumer protection legislation works unless the vendor is "in trade" i.e. private sales excepted.
Key word you used there was advert. I was talking price tag not advert. (differnce is that a price tag is information that the buyer seeks[going into shop and looking], where an advert is when the seller tells the consumer of the price [shop window, car with big price banner on it, adverts in paper etc] That is how the LAW is written. ) But in essence you were actually agreeing with what I was saying. If A can of beans is $2 on the tag but at the counter its $4bucks they don't HAVE to sell you it at $2, If you don't like the price you go to another shop.
Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot
Bookmarks