Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 119

Thread: F3 Rules, what ya all reckon?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    24th August 2004 - 02:36
    Bike
    1992 CBR900RR The Original
    Location
    wit da penquins
    Posts
    235
    I like the propsed rules... but I could be a bit biased(says the guy who spent squilions on suspension, now it handles like a GP machine) . 400's are getting old but there's a heap of them out there. If a 400 could have a handling advantage and SV's have a horsepower advantage then I say that's fair, just like the 250's vs 600's in the F2. There's good racing there. I say don't complain about the other guys bike. No-one's forcing you to ride the bike you're on.
    Two rights do not make a wrong. They make an aeroplane

  2. #32
    Join Date
    25th August 2004 - 21:45
    Bike
    GSXR 450
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
    Understand your point but, this is quite a serious issue, and for once it would be good to see if people can stay out of shit that does not concern them and try to stay on topic, Is that possible here on KB"er
    What do you think the SB forum is for? So how will these rules make it easyer to race?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163

    My opinion

    Before people toss viterol at me keep in mind Ive literally put EVERY spare penny and then some into building my SV --so Im NOT feathering my own nest in any way.
    AS per usual MNZ have OVER FUCKING COMPLICATED IT.
    In the uk theres a series Running very well and has for a few years.
    Its so frigging easy.
    Start of season --you wanna enter 650 twins--rock up get ya bike dynod -Its gotta make 75hp or less
    Its SEALED for the season except for oil and filter
    If ya have to do major work that brakes the seals then it needs to be redynod -
    Basicly what this does is lets someone buy a bike -run it in then go out and race it off the showroom floor. By the same account it lets someone like SVS or gary H carry on with their bikes -provided they were under 75 hp (My bike wouldn't be eligable)
    Suspension wise --I say back shock--open slather -provided it is shock only not swingarm etc
    Front end --well Shaun ya gonna hate me here (again keep in mind Ive poured moonbeams into getting mine sorted with the usd setup)
    My opinion is it shoud be stock externals.
    Again why reinvent the wheel --Guys in the USA and UK are racing using normal forks -Why add potentially $3000 to the price of a bike build?
    In a nutshell-
    do what ya frigging like to the motor/exhaust --pour the national debt into it if ya want--but if it dynos up over 75hp your out before ya start.
    bodywork--aftermarket glass -to save costs come crash time
    rear shock---any replacement shock unit provided no mods to anything else are needed
    Front end--stock looking --thats a big expense saved
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 08:10
    Bike
    GSXR450
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    7,037

    ?

    Texmo, Sometimes I get a little too excited

    As a huge proportion of the countries F3 riders either are on here, or cruise through here, I was very curious to see what they have to say.

    My rule suggestion thingy, was just that, I thought by writing another alternative/ proposed set of rules, it would help get write down to what people really do want, and what is going to work!

    I obviously have an interest in how this all turns out apart from the passion of our sport, but really do not give a Rats arse about that, as there is always another Fish for the pan, apart from the fact that Club racing scene has more relaxed rules than the champs, so current converted SV's for example will still have a place to play anyway, the only people this really effects is those wishing to race the NZ champs really, as the club people cater for a lot more riders, look at the Vic scene for example, brilliant.

    There is one man on this site ( It has been suggested to him) who could co-ordinate getting in touch with all F3 MNZ Licence holders, and have them put in writing what they want, and come up with the best compromise based on numbers, I bet all his exspenses for doing this would be met as well!

    We'll see what happens

  5. #35
    Join Date
    7th April 2006 - 09:17
    Bike
    1986 Suzuki GN250
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    407
    Get rid of F3 and have stock GN racing instead.

    It will be hard changing any rules on an established class such as this, whatever happens some people will be put out.

    How about like the post classics with a F3 jnr for the 400's and a F3 snr for the 650's.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    milkey--Ill tell ya why--Now Frosty and mark wiggley this year were on 650 twins. For various reasons putting out the same HP (fuckitt). Keeping us more than just honest were Kawa kid and stu dawe both on 400's--we were at the very front of the feild
    As long as theres a Hp cap then the 400's can play untill they become extinct which Im sorry will happen unless the japs get back into decent HP 400's again.
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Quote Originally Posted by texmo View Post
    Just one question, what do they hope to acheive by creating these limits we have to reply to?
    By limiting the available mods it limits the money you NEED to spend to compete.
    FFS --dont you guys gettit. --limit the mods/limit the Hp--- Increase the machinerery that can compete. Nett result 400's still can play with the 650's
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    Quote Originally Posted by cowpoos View Post
    a fast rider can easily make a slow bike look fast.....no doubt I get the jist of what your saying....but it ain't that easy to police
    this IS a good point.
    on sunday RG100 lent luke (mud Boy) his 150(?) bucket and used luke's Rg50, luke was giving it heaps and having a lot of fun....... but glen was almost on luke's tail the whole time...
    this is not saying that luke's Rg50 is fully worked, as glen's 150 can keep up with my bike ... (just) but how great a rider(rg100) the bugger is!!!


    what a ride so far!!!!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    Before people toss viterol at me keep in mind Ive literally put EVERY spare penny and then some into building my SV --so Im NOT feathering my own nest in any way.
    AS per usual MNZ have OVER FUCKING COMPLICATED IT.
    In the uk theres a series Running very well and has for a few years.
    Its so frigging easy.
    Start of season --you wanna enter 650 twins--rock up get ya bike dynod -Its gotta make 75hp or less
    Its SEALED for the season except for oil and filter
    If ya have to do major work that brakes the seals then it needs to be redynod -
    Basicly what this does is lets someone buy a bike -run it in then go out and race it off the showroom floor. By the same account it lets someone like SVS or gary H carry on with their bikes -provided they were under 75 hp (My bike wouldn't be eligable)
    Suspension wise --I say back shock--open slather -provided it is shock only not swingarm etc
    Front end --well Shaun ya gonna hate me here (again keep in mind Ive poured moonbeams into getting mine sorted with the usd setup)
    My opinion is it shoud be stock externals.
    Again why reinvent the wheel --Guys in the USA and UK are racing using normal forks -Why add potentially $3000 to the price of a bike build?
    In a nutshell-
    do what ya frigging like to the motor/exhaust --pour the national debt into it if ya want--but if it dynos up over 75hp your out before ya start.
    bodywork--aftermarket glass -to save costs come crash time
    rear shock---any replacement shock unit provided no mods to anything else are needed
    Front end--stock looking --thats a big expense saved
    frosty,... you make things sound toooooo easy


    what a ride so far!!!!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 08:10
    Bike
    GSXR450
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    7,037

    yep

    As above, how simple can it be.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Guys it CAN BE that simple
    Heres a lil shift in thinking -a tiny one mind you.
    Why not Just put a HP cap on F3 . Make it apply for 3 seasons so a bike built one year isnt gonna be defunct next year.
    75 HP -BANG -not one HP more
    Doesn't matter if its a 450cc 4, a 750cc air cooled 2 valve twin,a 250 two stroke or a 650 twin.--The HP limit applies. BANG
    At national level-again engine sealed after dyno run
    At club level--where being honest we are competing all season for a $10 tin cup -Either you have a sealed motor or you're happy to be protested for over HP -if you have over HP ALL championship points automaticly removed and bike disqualified from furthur meetings till it complies HP wise
    75 is gonna mean 400s are still gonna be able to give the 650's a hard time
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  12. #42
    Join Date
    12th February 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    08 ZX-6R Race Bike, FXR150
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    Guys it CAN BE that simple
    Heres a lil shift in thinking -a tiny one mind you.
    Why not Just put a HP cap on F3 . Make it apply for 3 seasons so a bike built one year isnt gonna be defunct next year.
    75 HP -BANG -not one HP more
    Doesn't matter if its a 450cc 4, a 750cc air cooled 2 valve twin,a 250 two stroke or a 650 twin.--The HP limit applies. BANG
    At national level-again engine sealed after dyno run
    At club level--where being honest we are competing all season for a $10 tin cup -Either you have a sealed motor or you're happy to be protested for over HP -if you have over HP ALL championship points automaticly removed and bike disqualified from furthur meetings till it complies HP wise
    75 is gonna mean 400s are still gonna be able to give the 650's a hard time

    Now that is an awesome idea!!!
    See Robert Taylor for any Ohlins requirements www.northwest.co.nz
    Thanks Colemans Suzuki
    Thanks AMCC
    I use DID Chains and Akrapovic Exhausts

  13. #43
    Join Date
    23rd June 2005 - 08:34
    Bike
    Can i have a fast one
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    22
    The HP thing isnt the greatest idea. Its not hard to flatten the HP off with a few jetting tweaks or altering advance etc before the Dyno run and then later on re jetting or adjusting advance etc. Engine still sealed and those 5 or whatever hp gained back again.

    These rules do make sence with a few minor tweaks.

    Ironic thing is a few years ago when the SV was introduced MNZ got hold of the leading f3 riders at national level as well as a few other people to get there thoughts on how the rules should be set up. These proposed rules that are coming about now are almost identical to what the majority of us thought would be the way to go. Unfortunatly we were asked but not listened too. How unusual

  14. #44
    Join Date
    8th May 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    '06 Yamaha R6
    Location
    Te Kauwhata
    Posts
    292
    No matter what rules you apply it will still come down to rider ability and how much money you have to spend so why bother changing the rules we have now and are living with.

    Take the Tigcraft as an example and Steve Bridges Vee Twin a few years back, both could be argued as being ineligible for the F3 class based on the rules that frame and engines are supposed to be originally from production bikes. Steve built his frame and the Tigcraft I think is a Honda RS125 chassis. You could even argue that MX based engines are ineligible as even the manufacturers claim they're not standard production motors and won't warrant them as such (I know that's stretching it a bit).

    If the proposal went thru and I wanted to go race F3 again I'd ring up my mate in USA borrow a whole lot of money from the bank and buy the Fischer with all the extras please...based on a Hyosung motor with hand built frame, ohlins suspension, light weight wheels, top of the line brakes etc. all stock standard from the original manufacturer plus performance upgrades to the motor.

    Even the 75 hp rule could be abused if you had lots of money you could design a motor to have almost the full 75hp from 3000 revs onwards...wouldn't that grunt out of corners well on NZ's short tracks!

    So, just to repeat myself and probably be a bit too cynical....why bother changing the rules again when we all pretty much know what we gotta do now, plus there's a whole bunch of modified bikes out there which could be ruled out (including one of mine that Logan's supposed to be riding).

    Cheers, Greg

  15. #45
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 08:10
    Bike
    GSXR450
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    7,037

    questions

    Greg, I have no idea why the rules are being looked at, apart from the fact
    that the F3 rules have been a very long on going toppic.

    As far as I am concerned the class is working well, there is alqys going to be some one who complains that so and so's bike is better, but that is a fact of life.

    If things get to serious RE the F3 rules, this will add another cost facture due to protests etc, apart from the hassle facture

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •