as yes, owning motorbikes is fun isnt it.
Any chance you could fix half these problems yourself - it will teach you alot about the bike.
My RZ and RG i replaced about 80% of the nuts, bolts, screws etc
as yes, owning motorbikes is fun isnt it.
Any chance you could fix half these problems yourself - it will teach you alot about the bike.
My RZ and RG i replaced about 80% of the nuts, bolts, screws etc
I have owned 3 different sort of Suzukis from brand new - the only thing ever needing replacement under warranty were some indicator covers that suddenly "fell off" immediately after a service (like someone twisted them, when they don't twist but pop off)
One of the reasons you buy a new bike isn't it - so things don't break, fall off or otherwise come apart.
Completely un-related but that's so true.
I was passenger in a Canary yellow RX7 when it began overheating on the motorway just before the Terrace tunnel. We pulled over, and raised the bonnet and smoke began pouring out. Not long after there was a five car nose to tail as everyone was looking at this yellow car almost on fire and not infront of them.
Ok guys just got back from TSS (great store that)
The rear shock is dead and needs to be replaced so that will be done at the same time as the rattle is fixed
I Also put aside a tank bag which I'll pick up tomorrowso I can finally loose the backpack.
I think most of your problems can be put down to poor assembly and not quality or reliability. Ixion has a very valid point too. A lot of the dealers selling Hyosungs are starting to pay attention to common minor issues, such as the rubber peg rests coming loose, along with the chain guard. A simple re-tightening with a bit of lock tite does the trick.
Hyosung on a mechanical/build level have a mound of experience and history in the motor industry behind them. It is everyone else that causes the problems. Distributors/Dealers who don't assemble bikes properly, service technicians who make "human errors" and of course the people right at the top of the pyramid who decide "the cheaper part is better, it does the job, so what?" then it causes problems then its a bunch of red tape bullshit to resolve it.
And last but not least, the end user, the rider is ultimately responsible for the maintenance of a bike: How it is stored, how often is it cleaned, the accuracy of service intervals and so on.
So to answer your question, no, it is not the most unreliable bike every made. It just had too many humans making errors involved in its conception.
NC4R, why the 'covering up the private bits' in your shots?? does your bike have genitalia?? Or is it just shy?
Fallen off too many times to ride fast nowadays.
Hmmm,
The bike has just over 3500km on the clock, it's stored in a garage at night and in an undercover car park during the weekdays.
Last service was at 1000km, the chain was re greased about 800kmish ago and prob needs to be redone (this weekend all going well). Cleaned... hmmm I cleaned it for UncleB's funeral, but not since.![]()
I've never bought a car / bike / anything with a motor brand new for three reasons....
1) I'm too tight to shell out full price for anything,
2) the depreciation on a new vehicle in the first year or two is horrendous, and,
3) all of the factory "bugs" have been ironed out by the first owner.
Nothing with so many moving parts can be expected to come out of the factory 100%.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks