Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: We are losing the battle to ACC

  1. #61
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 15:20
    Bike
    Cagiva Navigator 1000
    Location
    1A
    Posts
    1,603
    The squeaky wheel gets oiled. Or so they say. But only if it doesn't fall off by the way. We have so far made a lot of noise and the pollies (forget ACC, its the pollies) will be betting on us losing interest and momentum along the way. Its just human nature and after a while, people get on with their lives and their cause often fades into obscurity. If we fade away for a while, then yes we will have lost. They need to hear our screech as loud and as long as it takes to get what we want. And yes, I3 is right, embarrass them, piss them off and hurt them (or their mates) in the pocket. All within the law of course.
    Now is not the time to be talking defeat...
    Battles do cost money, so perhaps we should all put in a few bucks to help our cause. Worth the fight I reckon.
    If you love it, let it go. If it comes back to you, you've just high-sided!
    مافي مشكلة

  2. #62
    Join Date
    25th July 2006 - 00:22
    Bike
    10 speed 1995
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    288

    Can any workplace reps worm in & squeak here?

    Quote Originally Posted by BMWST? View Post
    it is about ACC,the pollies will be mulling over the "problems" with ACC but the ideas will be coming from ACC
    Nope from independent advisors and whichever industry stakeholders are highly regarded enough to consult. A report on WHAT is causing the road safety blowout is due early next year - and they will have prepared projections based on same same policy impacts. Would equal a tripling of the motor vehicle liabilities in the next 5 years (repeating the last 5 years trend if they keep the speed and drunks quotas approach up).
    http://www.dol.govt.nz/initiatives/w.../acc/index.asp

    Ixion - that legislation closely ties in from my reading - as it doesn't so much move to a fault basis but to a risk based one. On such a basis those 64 year old pre pensioners should be paying big ACC fees due to their frail bones.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    1st July 2007 - 17:40
    Bike
    my little pony
    Location
    shoebox on middle of road
    Posts
    1,522
    Quote Originally Posted by candor View Post
    Nope from independent advisors and whichever industry stakeholders are highly regarded enough to consult. A report on WHAT is causing the road safety blowout is due early next year - and they will have prepared projections based on same same policy impacts. Would equal a tripling of the motor vehicle liabilities in the next 5 years (repeating the last 5 years trend if they keep the speed and drunks quotas approach up).
    http://www.dol.govt.nz/initiatives/w.../acc/index.asp

    Ixion - that legislation closely ties in from my reading - as it doesn't so much move to a fault basis but to a risk based one. On such a basis those 64 year old pre pensioners should be paying big ACC fees due to their frail bones.
    OI!, we'll be pensioners some day, and I'll be riding more than ever,
    and pensioner motorists are more heavily subsidising others as they receive the pension anyway, and do not receive 80% of their lost income.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •