Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 211

Thread: New ACC motorcycle levies confirmed

  1. #61
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,502
    Blog Entries
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by bogan View Post
    Marine Y2K running on kero should do the trick! or an electric, you able to put the $ increases on that sheet as well as the %
    updated the attachment... even made it a bit more pretty with red
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    4th March 2008 - 08:54
    Bike
    2005 BMW F650GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    12
    What a bunch of idiots. They pay no attention to the arguments of cc rating over horsepower or increasing levies on petrol to cover those that travel more.. just another complete brainless arbitrary wave of the power wand... roll on the next national protest...

  3. #63
    Join Date
    8th July 2006 - 22:35
    Bike
    Now bikeless :-(
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    524
    Quote Originally Posted by bikemike View Post

    Petrol motorcycles 601cc and over
    252.69 745.77 426.92
    Non-Petrol motorcycles 601cc and over
    392.09 781.12 460.08
    Quote Originally Posted by James Deuce View Post
    Diesel bikes.
    That's for when John Deere amalgamates with Hogley Fergusson

  4. #64
    Join Date
    25th May 2004 - 23:04
    Bike
    1963 Ford Thunderbird
    Location
    Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,869
    Quote Originally Posted by bogan View Post
    it'd bite those who only have one vehicle in the bum, but I currently have four registered and one on hold (two of which wont be renewed), so I'm all for the license based levy. There is probably the idea that those who have more than one vehicle are financially better off, which is true in some cases but BS in others, my 5 are probly only worth 10k all up, paying over 1k per year to keep em al on the road isn't financially viable for me. On the other hand what if someone only uses a car once or twice a month, which they borrow, still fair to charge them the same as me?
    Agreed - we have six bikes and three cars. All three cars are registered all the time as all are needed on a regular basis. Two bikes are always registered all the time, one other is a dirt bike, and the other three are on exemption during the times of the year they are not used. So we will end up paying at least $1500 a year on a regular basis, plus a portion for the other bikes. Not to mention our earner levies, and my levies from self-employment.

    Time off work for either of us due to motorcycle (or any vehicle) injuries - nil. Time off work at present from falling down a flight of fucking stairs - three weeks and counting! Additional costs not covered by ACC for said injuries - $135 and I haven't even started physio yet!
    Yes, I am pedantic about spelling and grammar so get used to it!

  5. #65
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:32
    Bike
    bike decoration, 02 1150Gs, 2015 Indian
    Location
    wif Mrs Shrek of course
    Posts
    3,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev DJ View Post
    We can put the smaller reductions down as a definite win for NZ's biking fraternity - but it is only one battle that we have won - not the war!! The concept of having to pay more at all is still unjustified and needs continued pressure.

    We still want a zero increase, we are not Trout, and we are angry... Rev
    with you on that, just read the incress on the net
    Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends. (John 15:13)

  6. #66
    Join Date
    7th November 2007 - 16:01
    Bike
    Ninjaaaa!
    Location
    By The Mount
    Posts
    938
    Its still a bigger percentage rise than the other road users (except for mopeds), and does in no way fit in with ACC's no fault system. The cc groups are absurd, I ride more carefully on my 650 than I did on my 250. NOT FUCKING HAPPY. Actually I think that a good protest that fucks up heaps of peoples' travel for the day would make me feel better. We tried being nice and it did work but not to the extent we wanted. Im all for pissing off the public now.

    Fortnightly Adventures



    Quote Originally Posted by Cr1MiNaL View Post
    sigh, people with big mouths on here are always the ones with little or no skill.
    Roffle

  7. #67
    Join Date
    2nd December 2007 - 20:00
    Bike
    Baby Gixxer
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,503
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post


    Personally I'm happy to see the $30 going to an injury prevention fund. I have concerns that it will just become a slush fund, but the Minister has indicated that he wishes to work with motorcycling organisations. So, let's wait and see on that.


    And - all said and done , we ALL need to remember that the fundamental problem is still there. We are falling off our bikes far too often.

    Fix THAT problem and the rest goes away. So, stop bloody falling off, OK ?
    Is it really that simple Les? Am I just being a cynical old moo-cow for wondering if they'd really be any nicer to us even if there were zero claims by motorcyclists over the next 12 months? (One can but hope, even if in vain).
    I reckon they'd still be eyeing us up as an easy screw.

    Quote Originally Posted by James Deuce View Post
    Won't ever happen. They started down that path with the Direct Access scheme, realised it was encouraging people to buy and ride bikes and withdrew the scheme.
    Definitely in line with the "get rid of motorcycles from NZ roads by 2050...

    Quote Originally Posted by Beemer View Post
    Agreed - we have six bikes and three cars. All three cars are registered all the time as all are needed on a regular basis. Two bikes are always registered all the time, one other is a dirt bike, and the other three are on exemption during the times of the year they are not used. So we will end up paying at least $1500 a year on a regular basis, plus a portion for the other bikes. Not to mention our earner levies, and my levies from self-employment.

    Time off work for either of us due to motorcycle (or any vehicle) injuries - nil. Time off work at present from falling down a flight of fucking stairs - three weeks and counting! Additional costs not covered by ACC for said injuries - $135 and I haven't even started physio yet!
    Agreed. In 30 odd years of driving and the last 3 on a motorbike as well, this injury from my bike accident in March is the only time I've ever claimed ACC in regard to a vehicle accident. And never had any time off work requiring ACC to pay for loss of earning.

    While I realise that my collarbone surgery (had it yesterday morning) combined with the non-effective physio I had for the break earlier in the year was covered by ACC, people like me are a drop in the vast vast ocean of claims. They still need to tighten up on their "rip off" merchants - that alone would save them hundreds of thousands of dollars over a few years, if not millions.
    I lahk to moove eet moove eet...

    Katman to steveb64
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I'd hate to ever have to admit that my arse had been owned by a Princess.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Naki Rat View Post
    That's for when John Deere amalgamates with Hogley Fergusson
    Hogs 'n Deere? Sounds like a farm...
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  9. #69
    Join Date
    16th October 2009 - 17:09
    Bike
    RE5 and others
    Location
    Greytown
    Posts
    8
    Why aren't we feeling so gratefull to Mr Smith for generously lowering the rates from ACC recomendations? What a nice guy he really must be.

    NOT! I have written to him twice now asking specific questions about the fairness of charging multiple insurance premiums on the one risk when we own more than one bike. Guess what, he hasn't answered.

    I think THE major issue here is multiple ownership. It is a huge rip off.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    14th August 2007 - 19:24
    Bike
    2011 Thunderbird
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by oldrider View Post
    I withdraw that remark your honour but alas, the stain remains!

    Oldest union trick in the book, want 2% ask for 20%, satisfaction @ 5%!

    Not impressed with Mr Nick and Co.
    Exactly right Oldrider.
    Now if we park our bikes up for 6 months of the Year for Winter ACC will be getting a full years registration compared with last year. They have suck holed us big time.
    I will protest my vote at the next election by not voting National as I did last election for the 1st time and last time.
    Cheers Corky
    Christchurch, New Zealand

  11. #71
    Join Date
    4th March 2008 - 08:54
    Bike
    2005 BMW F650GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    12
    Multiple ownership just means more revenue which is more likely the reason they havent looked at it. I own 3x650 singles.. i scrape into higher levies with low powered bikes. I am very peeved.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    13th August 2009 - 09:28
    Bike
    Ducati Superbike
    Location
    sitting down
    Posts
    52

    Angry

    The thing that Fucks me off is that the media have really been obliviouse to the whole thing really - STILL NO ONE HAS ASKED HIM FACE TO FACE TO JUSTIFY HIS FIGURES and secondly NO MEDIA HAVE ASKED HIM WHY KEEP HITTING THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY PAYING A HIGH LEVY NOW IN PROPORTION TO THEIR USAGE and NOT TRY TO COLLECT FROM THE OTHER GROUPS THAT GOBBLE UP ACC FUNDS - RUGBY, SOCCER, NETBALL, DIRTBIKES, MOUNTAIN BIKE, ROAD CYCLISTS!!! FOR FUCK SAKE!!!!!

    Have a happy day

  13. #73
    Join Date
    20th April 2009 - 11:13
    Bike
    15th Anniversary Speedtriple
    Location
    Tuakau
    Posts
    231
    Can live with the increases if have to but still not happy. Will be much happier when see more motorcyclist safety campaigns. eg big signs on the road: "What's behind you?"

    It's the other road users that need educating about motorcyclist awareness.

    And when are cyclists going to be registred and come under the motor vehicle pool, after all they are a road user.
    Speeding Safely!

  14. #74
    Join Date
    15th October 2009 - 14:32
    Bike
    98 Honda Blackbird
    Location
    Hibiscus Coast
    Posts
    155
    Not happy, either. Any protest action now though will be difficult to justify the reason and keep the public on side. We can argue the toss over changing direction all we like, but the general motoring public won't give a toss. It'll be "those moaning bikers are STILL not happy, greedy fuckers". Therefore if the public aren't on side (and over time will become steadily offside, mark my words), then there's no need to keep them happy.

    I think one good strong hit at showing what can be done to slow down a city is worth a shot. And it should be soon, as a direct reaction to the shite decision.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    25th October 2009 - 19:54
    Bike
    FJR1300
    Location
    Spud Land Pukekohe
    Posts
    244
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil View Post
    Cool. So it looks like it's ONLY twice as much as the car levy.

    Not acceptable.
    No it's not acceptable........
    Lets keep up the good work for zero increase
    NONONO will see you on Saturday with the signs
    Dont stop NOW!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by James Deuce View Post
    V-Stroms look like an accident in a heat pump factory.









Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •