So in summary.
1. The road surface could be better but realistically the cost/benefit isn't far enough into the benefit part of the ratio for road users who are sensible and legal.
2. People who want something else from NZ roads need to fuck off to some other flat boring country and bitch about the price of petrol or how much tax they pay or some other shit there instead.
Simple, 'cause trucks is what fucks the roads. In fact trucks are responsible for so much of the damage it might as well be 100%. If trucks pay less than the total cost of road repairs they're getting a fucking good deal.[/QUOTE]
Are you Nick Smith undercover ?. This sounds very much like his Acc speech.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
You still miss the point that we allow 50 tonne trucks on our roads, these fuckwit contactors/engineers know this yet their work turns to shit 6 months to a year after completion, while every one balmes trucks. Bulid the fucking things properly the first time and they'd be no worries.
The damage to the road increases as the fourth power of weight. So, if a car be about one tonne, a 50 tionne truck, 50 times as heavy will cause 50^4 times as much damage . That is 6250000 times as much damage. Do such trucks pay 6250000 times as much toward the roads. No , they certainly do not . The reason that trucks can compete with rail si becaus etrucks are MASSIVELY subsidised by cars (and bikes). If trucks had to pay tehir fair share there would be bugger all big ones on the roads.
(Incidently , byt the same mathematics, if an average bike is 300 kg laden we should apy 1 / 3^4 roughly as much as a car - about one one hundredth very approximately. So why do we pay MORE? )
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Some of the best roads are over in the W Coast of the Mainland. Hard on tyres but that stretch from Grey up the Westport solid as.
skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
Some of the best roads are over in the W Coast of the Mainland. Hard on tyres but that stretch from Grey up the Westport solid as.
skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
No, its not racist. Im sure all immagrants are here because they were getting a shit deal back home, maybe not in roading, but as in the case of South Africans, being murdered en masse in their own homes.
Whats your reason Scracha?
Realise how good you have it & chill out about a few things.
Incedentaly, i am the son of a Dutch immagrant & first generation of the family to be born in NZ.
I have no desire to go & visit the shit hole called Holland, i know how good i have it here from having contact with my relatives.
The rating for a NZ Fire Service appliance is 25T with an 8T axle load. Assmuming this is typical of trucks on the road (I know many are higher), then the truck is 8^4 more than the car, where a car ha saroudn 1T axle load.
Don't see the trucks paying 4100 times that of a car?
Geoff
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) Peace through superior firepower...
Build your own dyno - PM me for the link of if you want to use it (bring beer)
Moreover, multiple axles are very far from compensating for extra weight. In many cases the damage is not bump impact (from a singlke wheel), but rather depression of an entire section of seal, from the great distributed weight on it. That is, the weight of the truck causes the road surface to flex. That is why we see corrogations and troughs in roads that trucks use.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
If we are going to talk about trucks weights, lets get the weights allowed accurate.
The maximum weight for a truck and trailer (7 or 8 axles) is 44 tonne, and the same for a B-train (7-9 axles).
There is limited trials being held for gross weights up to 50 tonne but these are on specified routes and tightly controlled as to the vehicles to be used, the company and drivers, the payload, and the route they can use.
As a truck axle moves down the road it sets up a wave action in front of the axle, and NZ having flexible pavements, the road is designed to do this.
Transport operators pay considerally for the use of the roads through Road User Charges, and according to their lobby group the Road Transport Forum, pay more than their fair share.
Of course there is a specialist group within the NZ police who do the job of making sure that transport operators comply with the huge number of rules controlling them but they are often hamstrung in their efforts by cost, which sort of brings us full circle back to getting the quality of road we can afford, and maintaining that quality.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks