Ah, being proactive about your riding, and your safety. One could in fact say, taking responsibility for your own safety.
Neither do I. But the rider at the end of the day is the one who has to be responsible for his or her own safety. Better to be, shall I say proactive about your riding and not have to blame anyone.
If you are following someone in the wet you should be at a distance that allows you to stop safely, for whatever reason. If you are too close, that's your fault. Got an oncoming car that might veer into your lane? It's called a hazard and it's something you should be alert for anyway. Have you ever done a defensive driving course? In the one I attended many years ago power poles were considered a hazard. Not if you crashed into one that is, but if for some reason it toppled onto the road. That's right. What are the chances of that happening? Less than a car veering into your lane, yet it was still considered a hazard. Doesn't mean you have to drive/ride everywhere anticipating one falling in front of you, but it helps you identify all hazards. And as far as someone turning right while you are overtaking them, well if they are slowing that's a sign of a hazard. And not many people turn right across traffic without slowing down.
No disagreement there.
I didn't call him an idiot. And from what I see he's posted, he's figured out that the safer option would have been not to pass.
I have been riding for just on 30 years minus about 7 years in 2 breaks, and the last off I had was in 1985. Of course I take responsibility for my own safety, and a huge part of that - possibly the biggest part, is recognising that other road users behave unpredictably and engage in behaviour that has the potential to put me at risk like, as Phreak has discovered, turning without looking or indicating. And that includes motorcyclists like luckylegs.
And no, you didn't call him an idiot - abusing him may be the fashionable thing for the playground bullies that hide behind their keyboards, but I think you're above that kind of behaviour.
The problem I have with the "all bike crashes are the fault of the rider" mindset is when you adopt that view you immediately discount a major hazard that we all face every day - low skills and dangerous driving by other road users. If Phreak didn't have the smarts to learn that, the only lesson he got from his crash would have been "don't go around a hazard, always stop", and sometimes that's not the best solution. Next time a similar thing happens, finding an escape route may be the best approach.
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
Shrub, I can only speak for myself when saying this, but I'm not saying that the motorcyclist is always at fault. What I'm saying is the motorcyclist is always responsible for their safety. What point is there in blaming someone else after an accident, except for legality reasons. It's best to avoid it completely in the first place, taking responsibility for your own safety.
Responsibility for your own safety and fault for the accident are not the same thing.
I agree entirely, and a huge part of being responsible for your own safety is knowing and recognising risks. You talked about power poles doing the unexpected - falling in your path. That's never happened to me, but what has happened to me (and more often in my car than on my bike) is other road users doing the unexpected and the bizarre. There is a mindset on these boards that being responsible for your own safety is discounting the role played by other road users and that all bike crashes are the fault of the rider involved.
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
18 years (driving, with a lesser number riding) and never an accident or incident turning right. Why is that shrub?
...don't disappoint me, keep your answer predictable! What ever you do
So you like the idea of insurance companies and their shareholders getting fat off exorbitant premiums, lawyers who get fat off litigation, the whole ambulance-chasing industry, no cover for those that can't/refuse to pay, and no community responsibility for the social costs of accidents?
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
No, none of that is good. But his idea of makeing medical insurance compulsary and fineing those who don't have it because they can't afford it is not the solution. If they can't afford the insurance, a fine certainly won't put them in a better situation. I don't have a solution but forceing people to spend money they have not got under the threat of a fine if they don't just isn't right. Plus, he has proved through his own actions that trying to spend the countrys way out of this depression is not working. When he took over the place was already fucked from 8 years of Bush Jr, Obama hasn't helped at all and the recent election tells us the large majority has seen this. Shit, even the Aussie $ is stronger than the greenback. Things here are bleak at best and people from places like NZ cannot fully comprehend it just by watching the news.
By the way, I am a Kiwi.
Ah, medical insurance...quite different from accident 'insurance', which is what I thought you meant.
ACC being groomed for sale as an insurance company...strikes at one of the foundations of NZ.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks