Advice needed on fighting a speeding ticket

[superman]

When you get receive the ticket in the mail, cross it corner to corner with a ballpoint pen and write "CANCELLED - NO CONTRACT" across it, reseal the original envelope, obliterate your name and address on the envelope and write "NO CONTRACT - RETURN TO SENDER" on it, and re-post it.

They will send you a computer printed reminder - open it and and cross it and write across the remittance advice "CANCELLED - NO CONTRACT", and do the return to sender thing again.

If they contact you again whatsoever, trespass the person and specifically forbid them or their agent to contact you again whatsoever regardless of topic, revoke all implied consent to approach or communicate with you, and begin harassment proceedings against the officer concerned warning him to call off his agent or else. Place a $200K lien on his family home.

If they dare to call you into a hearing (they won't) then quietly wander in there and once they start to speak, interrupt them and calmly enquire "what is this jurisdiction?" and whatever they reply with say "No consent in this jurisdiction." If they argue, just calmly state "No consent for any person to represent me, no consent to make any judgement about me in this jurisdiction, benefits are waived to all parties, all implied consent is revoked" and then zip lip. Say only the words "no consent" after this point.

That jurisdiction can only proceed with your consent, so revoke it. That'll make them squeal.

Oh that's right cops have implied consent here don't they. That's quite clever... but does it actually work is the question.

[riffer]

Sounds like a good way to earn a few days in the cells for contempt of court.

As usual, treat posts by this member with a pinch of salt.

[Smifffy]

We need theme songs for this thread.

[CookMySock]

Sounds like a good way to earn a few days in the cells for contempt of court. As usual, treat posts by this member with a pinch of salt.

We shall see. There is only one court in the land that can make any determination without your consent, and its not that one.

Whatever they say, reply with "not without my consent". Even on more serious matters the district court judge will ask you "in this jurisdiction?" which you can decline.

Don't be trapped into arguing with them! Arguing = consent to discuss = consent to make ruling. Don't do it!

Zip lip. "No consent."

[Bassmatt]

We shall see. There is only one court in the land that can make any determination without your consent, and its not that one.

Whatever they say, reply with "not without my consent". Even on more serious matters the district court judge will ask you "in this jurisdiction?" which you can decline.

Don't be trapped into arguing with them! Arguing = consent to discuss = consent to make ruling. Don't do it!

Zip lip. "No consent."

Have you actually done this or know of someone that has? And it was successful ? Or is this all theoretical and maybe you are looking for a guinea pig?

[BoristheBiter]

Have you actually done this or know of someone that has? And it was successful ? Or is this all theoretical and maybe you are looking for a guinea pig?

And when all this fails he will still be left no licence but now have a massive bill.
Like you say he's looking for a guinea pig.

[Skinon]

Hmm should look into it, ill try it next time im done for somethin, i always take it right to jury if i have too.

[CookMySock]

Have you actually done this or know of someone that has? And it was successful ? Or is this all theoretical and maybe you are looking for a guinea pig?

Am going through the process at the moment. Will report back.

edit: wasn't a speeding ticket - was for not carrying my license with me.. yes I know, a heinous crime against society, and one for which the officer was rightly very angry!

[Katman]

Am going through the process at the moment. Will report back.

That is you in your avatar, isn't it?

[Sparky Mark]

...is that the HP car with the personalised plate - SLOWDN?

Probably not. Unfortunately there were several 'personalised' plates nationwide that had to be removed, as apparently it wasn't a good look.

Personally I think it was a great way to get a message across without spendIng thousands on advertising...

But there you go...

[JimO]

Am going through the process at the moment. Will report back.

edit: wasn't a speeding ticket - was for not carrying my license with me.. yes I know, a heinous crime against society, and one for which the officer was rightly very angry!

good deal, buy a icecream get free legal advice

[FJRider]

good deal, buy a icecream get free legal advice

Free ... as opposed to good legal advice ...

The OP's original post seems to have been his last on site ... so it may not have gone well for him ...

[yod]

yes, i wonder if he managed to tighten his licence and/or 'the battle'

[red mermaid]

I know someone else who was trying this crackpot idea and has recently had about 6 trucks seized and got locked up on a few charges.

We can but hope for DB.

[tigertim20]

No..99.9% sure I wasnt.

if you are sure you werent speeding then contest it. dont think you need a lawyer. write in saying you are contesting it, they will send you the info you need, you will need to go to court. they may just drop it if it seems like too much hassle

Soooo ... what would have been the demerits for "lanesplitting" ... ???

if done within the law, nothing.