Should Katman shut the fuck up?

[Maha]

Many posts back I addressed that mistake. Message often valid, delivery and timing screwed, tact missing. Thought he might be able to learn

No, he wanted to gauge his support, thats all it was.

[oneofsix]

No, he wanted to gauge his support, thats all it was.

then his question was badly worded, no surprises there I guess (now)

[Usarka]

It is NOT opinion to state that a bit of fault lies with all participants in a crash.
It IS opinion to state the same is true for ALL crashes.
Neither myself, nor KM has ever said the second.

One of us is on crack because that makes no sense what so ever and seems to be the normal spohist contradictory argument we hear from the other goose.

Hopefully it's me that's on crack though

[avgas]

So what you are saying is that, ultimately, drongos are useless...

Nope my main point is that there is a space between drongo and chicken. Being either a drongo or a chicken is a bad thing so my recommendation is that people don't be either drongo or chicken. But something in between.

[terbang]

Not because of his message, but because the whiney way he delivers it kills it's impact.

[The Stranger:Me]

Not because of his message, but because the whiney way he delivers it kills it's impact.

What actually is his message?

Because to me it looks like - You dumb fuck you had an accident and ruined for all of us. Stop being human and making mistakes.

Did I get that right?

[Katman]

What actually is his message?

Because to me it looks like - You dumb fuck you had an accident and ruined for all of us.

That's close Noel but probably a bit harsher than I'd put it.

Stop being human and making mistakes.

Once again close, but more along the lines of - stop being so lazy and try harder.

[The Stranger:Me]

That's close Noel but probably a bit harsher than I'd put it.



Once again close, but more along the lines of - stop being so lazy and try harder.

Humans criticising humans for being human kind of smacks of hypocrisy from where I sit.

[Katman]

Humans criticising humans for being human kind of smacks of hypocrisy from where I sit.

So if you saw a human making the same mistake over and over and over again, you'd sit there and say nothing Noel?

'Cos that smacks of someone with their head up their arse.

[Usarka]

You seem to be managing quite well......

[Pussy]

That is a sentiment that I can agree with, and reading it doesn't piss me off - if only Katman could improve his style to achieve a similar affect.

Trust me, you won't get a box of chocolates and a bunch of flowers with Katman's message.
You will, however, get an easy-to-understand-language message

[BoristheBiter]

One of us is on crack because that makes no sense what so ever and seems to be the normal spohist contradictory argument we hear from the other goose.

Hopefully it's me that's on crack though

Hope its him, i have no idea what he meant by it either.
Unless i'm on crack too and don't know it.

[Number One]

No, he wanted to gauge his support, thats all it was.

rah rah...


This thread is the sober version of this thread

Are you feeling the love yet or is another poll in order?

[Grubber]

It is NOT opinion to state that a bit of fault lies with all participants in a crash.
It IS opinion to state the same is true for ALL crashes.
Neither myself, nor KM has ever said the second.

Oh yes it is. There was no "BIT" as you put it when i got hit by the 4 x 4. Trust me on that one...
If someone runs into you without any notice then it is TOTALLY their fault. How the fuck can it be anything to do with the one that was hit...fuck me!
If you're sitting at a set of lights and some moron rear ends you at 50kph, how the fuck is that your fault. Were you just supose to stay at home that particular night,,,what the???
The fact is that there will always be someone or both in some cases at fault for an accident. It is only opinion that there is a bit of fault in all parties involved in a accident, and the reason for that is, i have had an accident where it was nothing to do with me, and i have court documents to prove it.
Do you think you can find the logic in that or are you just too busy blowing your horn right now?

[MSTRS:Me]

It is NOT opinion to state that a bit of fault lies with all participants in a crash.
It IS opinion to state the same is true for ALL crashes.
Neither myself, nor KM has ever said the second.

One of us is on crack because that makes no sense what so ever and seems to be the normal spohist contradictory argument we hear from the other goose.

Hopefully it's me that's on crack though

Hope its him, i have no idea what he meant by it either.
Unless i'm on crack too and don't know it.

Just how simple does it have to be, to be understood?

In most crashes, the participants have contributed.
In a few crashes, one party did nothing to contribute and could not avoid involvement.

Is that easier to understand?

Oh yes it is. There was no "BIT" as you put it when i got hit by the 4 x 4. Trust me on that one...
If someone runs into you without any notice then it is TOTALLY their fault. How the fuck can it be anything to do with the one that was hit...fuck me!
If you're sitting at a set of lights and some moron rear ends you at 50kph, how the fuck is that your fault. Were you just supose to stay at home that particular night,,,what the???