Pour moi, it's hesitating to use the overtaking lane to get past the slow driver you pulled recently (I think t'was you, applause) who has just put his foot down to 110 after travelling at 70kmh for the last 15k's. I don't want no ticket but often feel forced to drive at the pace of inconsiderate & usually inattentive drivers & feel vulnerable to their actions. This happened to me yesterday & the only overtaking opportunity's I had often have a mobile ready & waiting. Soooo, on a lovely day, dry road, my speed was between 50 & 80kmh for 35 minutes behind a driver crossing the white line & hitting the verge because they were using a mobile phone & constantly rabbiting to their passenger.
I would be most dis-chuffed getting pinged for putting my safety first if ticketed for overtaking a numpty.
I have no beef with the law or it's enforcement but it is not making better road users. Gripe. Done.
By the same token, you speed habitually, you get caught, tough. Save it for the track.![]()
Sadly some people have NO idea about when it is saf/unsafe to go fast, as such the ptb decided that should they crash it better they do so at a lower speed to minimize the damage..
So the rest of us pay for their incompetence by having a speed limit to adhere to (mostly).
Make the drivers licence test a real test - and make people pay for training to be able to pass the test which will not have a 'scratchie' component, fail the test and you go 'down the snake' to start training again.
Then raise the speed limit a little in appropriate areas i.e. 125 on motorways etc.
And make it so the fines for speeding are minimal but up the demerits just a tad.
Then have it that if you exceed the 100 demerits within a year you have to start at scratch and redo your licence from the start again - training and everything.
And the Govt gets the take from training rather than tickets.
My little sort-of-almost-a-rant.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
for some it would, but then you'd have the whole PC brigade with "you cant show them that". Others it would have no effect, after all no amount of "gruesome" accidents could talk me out of jumping on a bike, & the people they did try. "bikes are dangerous" I'm sure a few others here have had the same
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
So long as they pay for their own hopitalisation and treatment if they crash that's fine by me, if I have to contribute to it then fuck them, leave them to die on the side of the road
It wouldn't make any difference to most people after all "it'll never happen to me"
Agreed, and the "it'll never happen to me" mentallity will be reinforced as they have just aquired the tools to "keep safe"
As for increasing speed limits to everyone on the road....Dont read this
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Thats the point. I wrote that days ago. The bit about your risk of injury or death increasing IF YOU CRASH.
No matter who causes a crash, the faster one party is going, the greater kinetic energy is imparted i.e. the bigger the mess.
If we could guarantee that crashes weren't going to happen, raising the speed limit would be easy. But we can't.
We don't live in a Utopian world of drivers who will see the bike coming ALL THE TIME, roads that NEVER HAVE GRAVEL ON THE PERFECT CORNERING LINE, any of those cool things.
Skoober Steve, good that we agree on that then.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks