The Ignitech DC CDI P2 ( or RACE ) was designed for a 2T ( like a Rotax tandem for example ) using low ohm coils driven by a capacitor.
They make the usual 12V switching units as well, but both can be programmed easily for non waste spark on a 4T by using a cam sensor that identifies cylinder 1.
I have built both systems on old Ducati Bevels and running waste spark on a slow reving 4T works fine without the complexity of having to make a cam sensor setup, just two sensors
in the side cover at 90* with a single rotor lobe.
The CDI system makes identical power to the 12V on a dyno, but the riders swear ( alot ) that the cdi feels better on track re throttle response.
PS - never heard of a tandem twin 4T, enlighten me?
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Old Brit bikes are sort of a tandem twin being a 360 deg twin. Same ignition sequence, possibly. Your comment about the cam sensor to locate #1 is needless complexity if you already have a MAP sensor. MAP sensor fluctuations will determine which part of the cycle a cylinder is in. On a 4 stroke anyway. MAP sensors aren't so useful on a 2 stroke.
Sure - its semantics but the Rotax is a tandem,one cylinder behind the other and they both fire together.
Brit bikes are parallel twins, both pistons moving together, but out of sequence on the firing strokes.
The old Ducati is a 90* parallel twin but fires sequentially at 270* apart.
Then you have a few essentially tandem V engines using knife and fork rods on the same pin,again the cylinders are longitudinally in line.
I agree, using the output of a MAP sensor to determine the crank position is one clever way to time for non waste spark.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Wobbly Re:Ignitech .. What's your take on this reported problem http://www.pit-lane.biz/t3652p20-2-s...cc-development > post no.2
There are several issues that I have worked thru to get the Ignitech to work its best.
Firstly is that they like low impedance coils - that is low DC resistance ( 0.2 ohm or less ) primary and a high inductance secondary.
The Suzuki RGV or Aprilia RS125/250 are the best common coils available, but I have used Crane PS92N cdi coils on Methanol burning Hydros where spark power is super important.
Stock Honda RS125/250 and CR250 coils are way too high resistance/low inductance to work well with this type of DC CDI.
Using both cdi to drive one coil doubles the effective energy available at the plug, and this is the way to get more power from say a RS125 Honda, especially if you swap out the coil.
Lastly using simply a battery alone isnt the go at all.
The voltage drops quickly under load with this setup, the DC CDIs work best when run with a battery that is being charged by the alternator at 14.2V continuously.
There is only one setup of MX rotor and stator that will drive sufficient current into an Ignitech for it to work best when using a cap instead of a battery.
The stator must have a 2 ohm winding and the rotor must be the later type with super strong magnets - you can feel them " clunk " over each pole as you rotate the rotor by hand.
You can see the voltage at the CDI drop ( on the computer screen ) during a dyno run - if the power supply isnt working as it should.
And as usual, the posts reveal that they werent using a resistor plug and cap as Seb4LO also pointed out, along with using the proper NGK race plugs.
So the spark would be all over the shop, not at the correct time to make power.
I dont know the exact calculation sequence the software uses, but I have found by trial and error that the best setup if possible,is to ensure that the addition of the base advance to the lobe duration
should be around the max advance used in the curve.
Having said that I have built several CR250 kart engines that have stock 6* of base and around 15* of lobe length, but the engine strobed exactly showing the 32* max advance as programmed.
And lastly I found that a lobe longer than around 20* length makes the calculations go haywire, and it will misfire badly at one rpm, then go perfectly well everywhere else.
There is a software button that says " wide lobe " and also one that says " no lobe length check ", but trying to translate from Czech what these actually do is impossible.
I simply cut the lobe length in 1/2 and it worked perfectly.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
I'm at a point that I need a right angle head porting tool to cut the port openings in the GP125 cylinder I'm working on. Without sounding like a cheap bastard, is there a very cost effective way of doing this without paying $500+ for some nice tools from CC speciality tools?
I did a bit of digging in this thread and found the above two posts. I take a recommendation like that from Wobbly as a very good one but still wonder if there's a cheaper way for a low volume of porting. I mean I'm not exactly going to be doing it day in and out to justify spending lots on tools.
Try this and let me know what you think
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Dental-Mi...item20d10daea2
![]()
They have other models as well.
There's a thought! Have you used these at all?
Heres a link to the burrs just to complete the post. Total of approx. AU$168 plus postage for burrs and machine
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/10pcs-DEN...ffc43db&_uhb=1
[QUOTE=husaberg;1130563152]Didn't F5 make/mod his own? it should be in his attached pics?
i can't believe I said simple dimple![]()
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Well I finally got the igni base adjusting ok. Had to start the bike.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Bookmarks