Stupid World

[mashman]

Last time I looked debt was generally directly associated with an asset. So you're planning on selling all debt carrying assets in order to wright down all debt?

Where will you live? And what do you think your house will sell for amongst the stampede of sales the implementation of your "policy" would drive.

Or p'raps you're just going to burn it down and tell the bank their asset's gone and you're not paying them squat?

As Stephen says, have a wee watch of the "plan". In regards to No Asset = No Debt... an Asset doesn't have to be a physical "thing". Think Intellectual Property. If the IP is bunk, but was worth several billion at the time of its conception, how are you going to sell it? Double entry book keeping. X = 0, then Y needs to equal 0. Complicate things no further.

[Ocean1]

As Stephen says, have a wee watch of the "plan". In regards to No Asset = No Debt... an Asset doesn't have to be a physical "thing". Think Intellectual Property. If the IP is bunk, but was worth several billion at the time of its conception, how are you going to sell it? Double entry book keeping. X = 0, then Y needs to equal 0. Complicate things no further.

I don't have time to watch some disaffected financier expound on his radical new conspiracy theory, which just happens to tickle your fancy. I'm too busy earning the money you reckon isn't worth shit. Also, I tend to construct my own opinions based on long term industry performance rather then adopt some pre-digested shite from youchoob.

As for assets not being physical, yes, probably a whole percent or so of the debt economy isn't physically extant. So what? Someone borrowed the cash, they're responsible for making good on the debt, that's what debt means, attempting to rock the foundations of the economic world by insisting otherwise is patently extremely wishful thinking.

And if you reckon you can do without debt then, like I said sell your house and give the bank back it's evel, corrupting alms, because the FACT is 83% of mortgage funding would vanish if you had your way. Don't like it? I'm, not surprised, you tend to favour taking advantage of the benefits of the financial industry and bleat like fuck about the responsibilities they entail. Tough, piss or get off the pot.

[blue rider]

.....................

[blue rider]

an oldie but still most excellent

[mashman]

I don't have time to watch some disaffected financier expound on his radical new conspiracy theory, which just happens to tickle your fancy. I'm too busy earning the money you reckon isn't worth shit. Also, I tend to construct my own opinions based on long term industry performance rather then adopt some pre-digested shite from youchoob.

As for assets not being physical, yes, probably a whole percent or so of the debt economy isn't physically extant. So what? Someone borrowed the cash, they're responsible for making good on the debt, that's what debt means, attempting to rock the foundations of the economic world by insisting otherwise is patently extremely wishful thinking.

And if you reckon you can do without debt then, like I said sell your house and give the bank back it's evel, corrupting alms, because the FACT is 83% of mortgage funding would vanish if you had your way. Don't like it? I'm, not surprised, you tend to favour taking advantage of the benefits of the financial industry and bleat like fuck about the responsibilities they entail. Tough, piss or get off the pot.

WOW, so many assumptions and absolutely fuck all to back them up with, Oscar will be so proud of you. I do not agree with the new chicago plan as I am still, even more so these days, against the idiocy of a financial system. I have adopted nothing from the internet (least of all the new chicago plan), I make my own decisions. You not being able to accept that as an absolute truth is your issue. With that in mind, I bid you adieu.

[mashman]

an oldie but still most excellent

cannot bling again, not even red ... that's some powerful shit.

[Brian d marge]

I don't have time to watch some disaffected financier expound on his radical new conspiracy theory, which just happens to tickle your fancy. I'm too busy earning the money you reckon isn't worth shit. Also, I tend to construct my own opinions based on long term industry performance rather then adopt some pre-digested shite from youchoob.

As for assets not being physical, yes, probably a whole percent or so of the debt economy isn't physically extant. So what? Someone borrowed the cash, they're responsible for making good on the debt, that's what debt means, attempting to rock the foundations of the economic world by insisting otherwise is patently extremely wishful thinking.

And if you reckon you can do without debt then, like I said sell your house and give the bank back it's evel, corrupting alms, because the FACT is 83% of mortgage funding would vanish if you had your way. Don't like it? I'm, not surprised, you tend to favour taking advantage of the benefits of the financial industry and bleat like fuck about the responsibilities they entail. Tough, piss or get off the pot.

Classic fail.org

Stephen

[Ocean1]

Classic fail.org

Stephen

Wow, there's a new take on "I got nuthin".

[Brian d marge]

Wow, there's a new take on "I got nuthin".

Because the post that I replied to , was self evident
So yes , classic fail.org

Stephen

[gwigs]

I don't have time to watch some disaffected financier expound on his radical new conspiracy theory, which just happens to tickle your fancy. I'm too busy earning the money you reckon isn't worth shit. Also, I tend to construct my own opinions based on long term industry performance rather then adopt some pre-digested shite from youchoob.

As for assets not being physical, yes, probably a whole percent or so of the debt economy isn't physically extant. So what? Someone borrowed the cash, they're responsible for making good on the debt, that's what debt means, attempting to rock the foundations of the economic world by insisting otherwise is patently extremely wishful thinking.

And if you reckon you can do without debt then, like I said sell your house and give the bank back it's evel, corrupting alms, because the FACT is 83% of mortgage funding would vanish if you had your way. Don't like it? I'm, not surprised, you tend to favour taking advantage of the benefits of the financial industry and bleat like fuck about the responsibilities they entail. Tough, piss or get off the pot.

Attachment 286125

[mashman]

Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces as Weapon of War: Photos and Data Emerge .

[blue rider]

Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces as Weapon of War: Photos and Data Emerge .

intersting, these pictures were floating around early in in the War on Terror and Iraquis, but were described as "Porn".

So now they are back as the real deal?

Well there never was a war without rape, war and rape always go hand in hand. To the victors go the spoils....and that is what women are. Spoils of war.

[mashman]

intersting, these pictures were floating around early in in the War on Terror and Iraquis, but were described as "Porn".

So now they are back as the real deal?

Well there never was a war without rape, war and rape always go hand in hand. To the victors go the spoils....and that is what women are. Spoils of war.

Well they seem to think there's 2000 or so and you'd have to be a dopey fucker to take pics whilst raping someone. One guy having been jailed would suggest that something happened without consent.

Soldiers should be shot for committing such crimes... and if it is a sanctioned interrogation technique, so should those who sanctioned it. In fact they should be castrated with a blunt spoon first, then shot... or maybe impaled slowly with a rod until it bursts their innards.

[Brian d marge]

Spoils of war ,,, I done gone married her ,, doh!
Damn

Stephen

[blue rider]

not sure why i am listening to this....but it still makes sense..