The GP and RG400 cylinders with their single exhaust port don't allow enough blowdown time area to make decent power. But I could sleeve an aircooled GP125 cylinder and add a T or tripple exhaust port, but thats not so easy to do with a RG400 cylinder as there is not much meat around the exhaust port area on one of those.
I am not sure what the cause of ND's problems was, or what the sleeve he used was made of, or if he fitted an iron sleeve within the original steel sleeve and had a bad thermal path. I just don't know much about how he went about things but I have heard he made a new sleeve and has pretty much got on top of the long track reliability issues now.
Attachment 230183 Attachment 230184 Attachment 230185
My plan is to use a large diameter, thick walled, plated alloy sleeve and bore the cylinder out as much as possible to maximize the heat transfer area between sleeve and alloy cylinder jacket. And of course it will be put together with CPU heat transfer paste.
I like your idea of using an RG150 cylinder as that would allow a thick sleeve like you suggest and possible a water gallery through the sleeves exhaust bridge too.
Wobbly has been planning everything for me around sleeved down RGV250 cylinders, but I like the idea of a larger sweeping bend up to the transfer port.
Attachment 230180 http://www.2stroke-tuning.nl/media/pdfjes/porting.pdf
Yamaha in their SAE paper said that the number one thing that affected power delivery was the angle of the port entering the cylinder and number two was the radius of the transfer duct, then the upswept angle of the port roof.
I will get Wobblys opinion on the shape and suitability of the RG150's port ducts which look a little different to the RGV's.
Bookmarks