Page 21 of 50 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 748

Thread: Mark Lundy - miscarriage of justice?

  1. #301
    Join Date
    20th October 2005 - 17:09
    Bike
    Its a Boat
    Location
    ----->
    Posts
    14,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    This has been well discussed. The high speed dash theory was not the cops first or best thinking. But since the pathologist was a retard and made up his own sniff test to give time of death, (as well as ignore normal and proven methods), the cops had to try and make the mad dash the most likely.

    That right there is the crux of the issue. The silly old cow that fingered Lundy running past her in drag, should be ignored by all I think.

    Does anyone know, do the police have to present the same case again? They'll lose if they do. I know that changing the prosecution is an admission of being wrong the first time an' all that, but fuck, do they want the guy let out over pride?
    Retrial means try again, have another go.. produce more/new evidence. Evidence that may/or may not go against the accused, forensic science has moved along in the years since Lundy was first convicted.

  2. #302
    Join Date
    19th November 2007 - 13:39
    Bike
    1994 Triumph Trophy 1200
    Location
    All over NZ
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    Take out the "eye witness", the "brain matter"
    Should never have been there in the first place - she said he was wearing a tie under his overalls - brain tissue found on a Tee shirt - who wears a tie with a Tee shirt?? She was a fruitloop.

    The time of death is the crucial point and by all accounts other than the doctor it points to a much later time than the police put forward!


    Quote Jan 2020 Posted by Katman

    Life would be so much easier if you addressed questions with a simple answer.

  3. #303
    Join Date
    8th July 2013 - 14:12
    Bike
    2007 suzuki gs500f
    Location
    nth island
    Posts
    10
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Unfortunately, the balance of probability is not good enough for a murder conviction - or any sort of conviction ...

    Yes, we will have to pay .. but what price is justice?



    He won't get a new sentence - if he's convicted again then time served will count ...

    Note he has not been released .. the Privy Council recommended he remain in custody .. which indicates they think he may be guilty - but the retrial needs to happen ... because there are evidential mistakes ... strong enough to matter ... if they truly thought there had been a miscarriage of justice then they would have him released pending a new trial ...

    He is well passed the first parole date .. but the board will not release him if he continues to claim he is innocent .. one of the requirements of parole is that you take responsibility for your actions, admit guilt and say sorry .. won't happen while people maintain their innocence ..
    he will remain in custody pending a bail application, the presidence has been set by releasing Bain on bail. he also had a 20 year non parole so he has not met any review dates.

  4. #304
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    Who benefits? ... Surely he had the motive and the most to gain if he was successful! ... His seriously bad (over) acting sealed it for me!

    Who else would be motivated that much to kill (with an axe) a harmless fat lady and an innocent young child?

  5. #305
    Join Date
    20th October 2005 - 17:09
    Bike
    Its a Boat
    Location
    ----->
    Posts
    14,901
    When he is found guilty for a second time (ok the human tissue found on his shirt could have come from the leper he had just rooted in Wellington earlier) will he still persist with that 'damn almost got away with it' look on his face?

  6. #306
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by oldrider View Post
    Who benefits? ... Surely he had the motive and the most to gain if he was successful! ... His seriously bad (over) acting sealed it for me!

    Who else would be motivated that much to kill (with an axe) a harmless fat lady and an innocent young child?
    So you have motivation and a shifty look, but nothing in the way of credible eye witnesses or physical evidence.
    Kinda rough justice, no?

  7. #307
    Join Date
    13th March 2006 - 20:49
    Bike
    TF125
    Location
    Hurunui, FTW!
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by oldrider View Post
    Who else would be motivated that much to kill (with an axe) a harmless fat lady and an innocent young child?
    Robin Bain?

  8. #308
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Madness View Post
    David Bain?
    Corrected that for you!

  9. #309
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Madness View Post
    Scott Watson?
    Or maybe ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  10. #310
    Join Date
    13th March 2006 - 20:49
    Bike
    TF125
    Location
    Hurunui, FTW!
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Or maybe ...
    Surely not Tamahere!

  11. #311
    Join Date
    5th August 2007 - 19:35
    Bike
    one that goes
    Location
    In a tent
    Posts
    792
    All but Watson are guilty. Watson is the one I believe did not commit a crime.

  12. #312
    Join Date
    14th June 2011 - 01:46
    Bike
    Between bikes
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    And there's the problem.
    Take out the "eye witness", the "brain matter", and the Petone Grand Prix, the Police don't have a case.
    If they come up with new evidence (which they are allowed to do), it would have to be pretty good to get a conviction.
    And we'll have the issue of compensation passed around the media circus after the not guilty.

    Would be a tad easier if we did have Not Proven in this blimmin country. If the retrial = 'not guilty', ya get compo, if the retrial = 'not proven', ya don't. Save some fucking about.

    Of course, somehow we have to make, I mean find, jobs for all the kids that go and buy a law degree.

  13. #313
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    "Not proven" wasn't an issue in this case. The jury unanimously determined Lundy's guilt within a few hours of deliberation.
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  14. #314
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,378
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitcher View Post
    Do we, the taxpayers, really want to pay the cost of a retrial? It won't be cheap.
    I pay for a shit ton of things as a taxpayer that we shouldnt be funding. Like our PM's trips to gallivant on the world stage, or my rates paid recently for a woman to go and look at sandcastles in California (true story).

    Given that administration of a justice system is kind of a core part of our society, then absolutely we need to run it again.

    My personal view (thanks for asking) is that he did it but that the TOD and thus pleece case was compromised. But juries go "Oh yup: blu blockers? Put him away" - and rightly.

    If a more accurate TOD can be ascertained (big if: they've been in the ground 12 years odd) then we'll see how it goes.

    No one has mentioned John Barlow either. He's out now I think?
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  15. #315
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,378
    Quote Originally Posted by Erelyes View Post
    And we'll have the issue of compensation passed around the media circus after the not guilty.

    Would be a tad easier if we did have Not Proven in this blimmin country. If the retrial = 'not guilty', ya get compo, if the retrial = 'not proven', ya don't. Save some fucking about.

    Of course, somehow we have to make, I mean find, jobs for all the kids that go and buy a law degree.
    the not proven verdict is from Scots law, which is based on Roman law, not common (English) law. it will never come here unless on a statutory basis - and why would it? its hard enough to get BRD or BOP thru to a jury.

    On the whole I am comfortable with the status quo re compensation. And the higher the hurdle is set for Bain the happier I am, convinced as I am that he did it. Even if the Nazionals are being toooootal pricks about it I sort of admire it, even though I hate them. Crusher collins can kiss my arse.
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •