Should never have been there in the first place - she said he was wearing a tie under his overalls - brain tissue found on a Tee shirt - who wears a tie with a Tee shirt?? She was a fruitloop.
The time of death is the crucial point and by all accounts other than the doctor it points to a much later time than the police put forward!
Quote Jan 2020 Posted by Katman
Life would be so much easier if you addressed questions with a simple answer.
Who benefits? ... Surely he had the motive and the most to gain if he was successful! ... His seriously bad (over) acting sealed it for me!
Who else would be motivated that much to kill (with an axe) a harmless fat lady and an innocent young child?
When he is found guilty for a second time (ok the human tissue found on his shirt could have come from the leper he had just rooted in Wellington earlier) will he still persist with that 'damn almost got away with it' look on his face?
All but Watson are guilty.Watson is the one I believe did not commit a crime.
And we'll have the issue of compensation passed around the media circus after the not guilty.
Would be a tad easier if we did have Not Proven in this blimmin country. If the retrial = 'not guilty', ya get compo, if the retrial = 'not proven', ya don't. Save some fucking about.
Of course, somehow we have to make, I mean find, jobs for all the kids that go and buy a law degree.
"Not proven" wasn't an issue in this case. The jury unanimously determined Lundy's guilt within a few hours of deliberation.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
I pay for a shit ton of things as a taxpayer that we shouldnt be funding. Like our PM's trips to gallivant on the world stage, or my rates paid recently for a woman to go and look at sandcastles in California (true story).
Given that administration of a justice system is kind of a core part of our society, then absolutely we need to run it again.
My personal view (thanks for asking) is that he did it but that the TOD and thus pleece case was compromised. But juries go "Oh yup: blu blockers? Put him away" - and rightly.
If a more accurate TOD can be ascertained (big if: they've been in the ground 12 years odd) then we'll see how it goes.
No one has mentioned John Barlow either. He's out now I think?
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
the not proven verdict is from Scots law, which is based on Roman law, not common (English) law. it will never come here unless on a statutory basis - and why would it? its hard enough to get BRD or BOP thru to a jury.
On the whole I am comfortable with the status quo re compensation. And the higher the hurdle is set for Bain the happier I am, convinced as I am that he did it. Even if the Nazionals are being toooootal pricks about it I sort of admire it, even though I hate them. Crusher collins can kiss my arse.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks