what did i say about the drop in consumer spending
wheres the lifeboats . . .
http://m.bbc.com/news/business-30283768
stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
bwaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa
"A strengthening economy that changes consumers' reliance on deep discounts, a highly competitive environment, early promotions and the ability to shop 24/7 online all contributed to the shift witnessed this weekend," said NRF president and chief executive Matthew Shay in a statement."
It has nothing to do with people not having any money or indeed not wanting to waste what they have on shite. That'd be contrary to the reports that state otherwise.
lol... thank fuck you ain't normal as I remember it to be a rather nasty state to be in.
We know it trickles down the back of yer throat. Here's hoping what's trickling down doesn't get any saltier.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
na not so bad cheap white wine . . . have to go back to work in 30 min at the Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre.
and we dont want any fked up gammas now do we
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
... no, really, there's lots cheating going on... say it ain't so.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_63.pdf
Unprivileged enemy belligerents are belligerents who do not qualify for the
distinct privileges of combatant status (e.g., combatant immunity). Examples of
unprivileged belligerents are:
(a) Individuals who have forfeited the protections of civilian status by joining
or substantially supporting an enemy non-state armed group in the conduct of hostilities, and
(b) Combatants who have forfeited the privileges of combatant status by
engaging in spying, sabotage, or other similar acts behind enemy lines.
“A purely military emergency could give no excuse for disregarding International
Law. Because victory is endangered, victory must not be pursued by breaking the
law on the grounds of necessity, because the laws of warfare are supposed to rule
over this conflict which is always connected with need and want.”
Trial of German War Criminals, Nuremberg, 1946
squeek squeek
"Rules of war" ... FFS! ... That has to be the stupidest statement ever uttered.Just do away with war now that we know better!
![]()
We brand Russell Brand a hypocrite.
Amusing. What was he doing there? Oh yeah, he was helping to hand in a petition from 300,000 people that are protesting being kicked out of their houses so that an American company can build nicer houses and up the rents.
Playing the man... scared old white muthafuckas desperately clinging on to their influence over the public![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
He is a massive hypocrite though. If the man does not take his own message on board, how good can it be?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...ss-empire.html
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks