Do you ever look at accidents and wonder "how fucking dense did you have to be to crash there?". Almost every single time. I work with several people who drive company vehicles as well, almost everyone else has had at least one crash, one workmate has written off one van and had 2 other big crashes, another has had a serious crash in the ute, one guy managed to have 3 crashes before his 90 day trial was finished.... He's still working for us to make sure he pays for the damages. 3 years into driving and still the only damage I've caused to the van in 160,000km is a broken aerial, and a scratch on the side from squeezing through a gap I shouldn't have. 5000 customers driveways and only one driveway fuck up.
It's not hard to not fuck up.
Speeding is not a criminal offence.
What makes you so special? How is the "brain dead moron to identify you from normal drivers?
Don't get me wrong I think our national speed limit is too low, I do think if you wish to advance an argument for the raising of the limit flagrant misunderstanding of the system compounded by a statement of intent to be have in a criminal manner ( by doing a runner from the Police ) you need to be aware that you are actually undermining your position by reinforcing the the negative stereotype of persons able to drive at 150.
The work colleague you mention in another post, how would his accidents have ended had they begun 50 k faster?
Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.
So unimpressed when cops drop the u turn in front of me, it has happened 2 or 3 times on a bike once In a 4wd,,
Correct me if I am wrong disco lights mean give way or otherwise make room, stop if they are behind you?
Surprising coincidence, all had the lights on but no noisemaker and no indicators.
Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.
Correct - lights only, no siren, and heading towards me. Where the road has already narrowed coming north out of Sanson. No doubt the cars in front of them were not pulling over fast enough but there is nowhere to pull over on that short stretch, until it opens into two lanes a klick or so further on.
Interestingly, a different (marked) police car was behind me Bulls to Turakina. Then on the 2-lane overtaking stretch up Turakina hill it rolled by me at 105+ km/hr... I was doing just the 100 for obvious reasons. Overtaking at 105 it didn't suddenly hit anything or veer off the road despite what we're told is an incredibly risky speed/maneuver... Then a few klicks later it did a U-turn to take off after a speeder. And yes - we're all paying attention now every time a police car breaks the limit even when overtaking in an overtaking lane / does a U-turn in the face of oncoming traffic... because that's what the police ticket us for.
It would blow out the eventual resale profit if I have to travel all the way to the south island for it. Ferry costs, hotel costs, flight home after impound etc....
I've only had one ticket in last ten years (Truck 12k over) and plan on keeping it that way as new employer of high repute requires clean licence... actually more of a motivator than any ad campaign or penalties.
Before that 1 bike ticket by mufti and one camera ticket truck.... and one friendly warning for 116k in wet back in the old days of relaxed enforcement.
On a side note my interactions with the ground, other vehicles and roadside furniture outweighs tickets issued.... guess us humans will be silly regardless of what happens from time to time.
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
On U turns - I see more civilians doing stupid u-turns weekly than cops. It does not make headlines when Joe Blogs does a u-turn and wrecks someones vehicle, body, life - it does it a copper makes the same error in judgement.
Police are given an enormous amount of direct, court-enforced power over (in this context) the travelling public. So they are not supposed to make the same errors in judgement. When you allow a surgeon to cut into your belly to excise cancer, you don't expect the surgeon to exercise the same judgement as a layperson.
We also still don't see any justification of the concept that whenever the road toll goes down the police brass claim credit for that result, but when it rises as a result of their zero-tolerance speed enforcement (so no one dares overtake and spends most of their drive looking at the speedometer), that result is completely divorced from Mr Cliff's enforcement policy?
Actually Police have SWFA power hence why criminals get away scot free so often....
So what your really trying to say is cops should have much better driving standards than us but be expected to be lenient to us found driving to much lesser standard....
A bad analogy btw, you realise how many people are harmed or killed by medical malpractice, way more than u-turning cops cars.....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Incorrect. What I said was that police should be demonstrating the safest driving standards precisely because they are the enforcers of safe driving.
In terms of medical malpractice we can agree to differ about the applicability of the analogy. I would point out however that medical malpractice is frequently seriously disciplined by the medical profession.
***Breaking News*** ***Breaking News*** ***Breaking News*** ***Breaking News*** ***Breaking News***
07 January 2015 2.29pm
New technology available to enforcement agencies means the new no tolerance scheme will now be extended to tyre tread. Previously a matchhead was used as a general gauge of if there was 1.5mm of tread remaining and officers using their discretion in marginal measurements.
But thanks to a Chinese supplier Wotuspinfor Happyplus new finely calibrated digital gauges Police will now be able to fine when the tread depth is 1.49mm. The new eco friendly solar powered gauges are accurate to within 0.0001mm and were used when aligning concrete blocks on the Three Gorges dam project. These super accuracy mostly tools are what the Chinese credit with the dams tolerances being better thena the Egyptian pyramids.
Dogs and Leppers guide author Clive Lambchops-Wilson-Fancyfucking-name says the new tolerance will cause crashes as motorists will constantly be looking out the window at their tyre treads instead of concentrating on driving. He and other critics have branded the exercise as revenue gathering. Already a pilot project using the new digital speed cameras is already issuing infringmenets for tyre defects spotted.
Staff at Columbian Necktie Retreads say they are bracing themselves for an influx of customers under the new tougher levels.
Image coutesy of Wotuspinfor China.
![]()
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
I saw about 7 cops today.
Decided at 11am to make a run for the cape. Packed up the tent, some undies and togs and jumped on my bike (running mint now with fresh oil/filter, electrical gremlin has been squashed and cables and levers all lubed and adjusted).
I'm in kerikeri at the moment. I caught up to another young guy who was riding a gsxr1000. He had a radar detector, so we cruised together from just past the toll road, to kerikeri where I turned off exhausted. A cop started following us after whangarei. Trying to stay at 100km/h is hard work. I'd rather not look at my speedo that long.
In future I think I'll just pull over and let police past me. Easier to follow them than to let them follow me. Don't ask me what the roads or scenery was like in the last half hour, fuck knows, all I know is my speedo is pretty to look at non stop.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks