Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

It's a viewpoint made by examining the science in search of the truth, I've never my viewpoint was 100% the truth. However, since it is made by examining the science, and since it is made by someone willing to discuss the science as well; it is a far, far, far more educated viewpoint than someone who doesn't even bother to read past the abstract of a journal article. And that's about all there is to say on the matter, if you still can't figure it out, then you are lost to reason, and we can only seek to limit the thankfully already minimal damage your misguided ideas can do to wider society.

Is it far, far, far more educated than the medical professionals, the university professors and the research scientists who disagree with you?

[husaberg]

Is it far, far, far more educated than the medical professionals, the university professors and the research scientists who disagree with you?

In case you never noticed the vast overwhelming majority of scientists and medical professional all agree vaccination is safe.

[Woodman]

Is it far, far, far more educated than the medical professionals, the university professors and the research scientists who disagree with you?

Do they say that we are better off without vaccination?

[TheDemonLord]

Is it far, far, far more educated than the medical professionals, the university professors and the research scientists who disagree with you?

What? All 20 of them?

[Katman]

What? All 20 of them?

Did you run out of fingers and toes?

[husaberg]

Did you run out of fingers and toes?

So you are only intersted in medical professionals opinions if they belong to a luntic fringe minority that agree with your own conspircy

[TheDemonLord]

Did you run out of fingers and toes?

Not really - I can count to 31 on one hand....
and 1023 on 2 hands....

(I wonder if you can work out how)

Also of interest is how many of those 20 or so 'researchers' either:

a: don't have a degree in epidemiology or Virology or other relevant medical field
b: Have had whatever qualifications or authority they did have revoked for their behavior
c: Have a direct, vested, financial conflict of interest with their 'research' (the kind of thing that according to Conspiracy logic 101 - if someone has something to gain from something, they are in on it and cannot be trusted)

[Ocean1]

Not really - I can count to 31 on one hand....
and 1023 on 2 hands....

(I wonder if you can work out how)

Also of interest is how many of those 20 or so 'researchers' either:

a: don't have a degree in epidemiology or Virology or other relevant medical field
b: Have had whatever qualifications or authority they did have revoked for their behavior
c: Have a direct, vested, financial conflict of interest with their 'research' (the kind of thing that according to Conspiracy logic 101 - if someone has something to gain from something, they are in on it and cannot be trusted)

Don't forget d: fuckwits.

[Woodman]

They are probably the same sort of expert as the aviation engineers in the 9/11 thread. Most were not experts at all when you drilled down Some were air hostesses/cabin crew, and pretty sure one was the guy who said "its a plane" when superman flew overhead.

[husaberg]

They are probably the same sort of expert as the aviation engineers in the 9/11 thread. Most were not experts at all when you drilled down Some were air hostesses/cabin crew, and pretty sure one was the guy who said "its a plane" when superman flew overhead.

yes the old Pilots For 9/11 Truth, Most that were not even pilots but baggage handlers and sniffer dogs.
Also the same as his proported Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Most that had no quailifications at all, Almost none of them would be quailified to design a multi story building.

[Katman]

For those who are unable to read anything more than the first page abstract of the study I previously linked, the full study can be accessed via a link on this page.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...y-wrong-doing/

[Ocean1]

For those who are unable to read anything more than the first page abstract of the study I previously linked, the full study can be accessed via a link on this page.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...y-wrong-doing/

We don't have to read it, dude, we know it's shit simply because you posted it.

But let's see... http://americanloons.blogspot.co.nz/...le-delong.html

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/tag/gayle-delong/


So, not an actual "doctor" eh? More yer lunatic accountant with a theory on autism induced breast cancer.

Go away fuckwit.

[Katman]

But let's see...

Dude, I'm well aware that the internet has no shortage of cocksuckers like yourself who immediately seek to assassinate someone's character rather than examine the content of their argument.

I'm convinced you're berkboy's twin.

[Ocean1]

Dude, I'm well aware that the internet has no shortage of cocksuckers like yourself who immediately seek to assassinate someone's character rather than examine the content of their argument.

Give it up, fuckwit, I'm not sucking your cock, OK?

No matter how many of your fuckwit friends you link to your cretinous conspiracy theories.

[bogan]

For those who are unable to read anything more than the first page abstract of the study I previously linked, the full study can be accessed via a link on this page.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...y-wrong-doing/

Excellent work. Now that you have read past the abstract, do you wish to discuss the AEs vs SAEs misapplication I pointed out earlier?