Never met the guy, so my perceptions are mostly via the press who, as I said I trust only to impart the maximum shock/horror spin to anything they "report".
I spent several days, once, supposedly being "media-proofed". It's surprisingly difficult to do well, or smoothly at any rate, but any politician reeks of it, the ability to say nothing anyone can get negative traction on. Unfortunately, it makes what they do say almost as irrelevant as what the press say they said.
Bit of a shame really, most of them are well worth listening to in any other environment. But that's politics as practiced in the west, and as me dear old uncle used to say: Love it or hate it, get good at it or get used to losing.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...ck-out-tenants
It's all easy eh?
Wtf does he think the very first thing residential investors will do if they thought that was on the table?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Good, let the investors who don't want to do any maintenance, and only have to give 90 days notice to vacate bugger off.
I've rented houses in 3 other countries and all by lease, means you can make plans more than 3 months ahead.
Note: I've had rental property in the past and tenants can be hard work.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Well y'know, if all dem poor bastards want to avoid paying rent they could always work as hard as the landlord did to buy the fucking house.
And by hard work I don't mean the sort where the tenancy tribunal gets to play referee.
And actually now that I think about it Gareth's scheme is really just formalising the current arrangement where the tenants get to trash the place and then refuse to vacate the premises or pay for the damage.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
He's perfectly clear about what he intends. And like anyone else concerned about people less well off than himself he's got the option of paying for their shit himself or stealing it off someone else. In this case he's stealing it off those rich pricks, 'cause they don't deserve all that money.
Now I dunno how dumb you got to be to look around the world and see how well that's working and STILL suggest it's a good idea, but it's certainly approaching your level of retardation.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Some of his stuff makes a bit of sense, that one falls far from the mark. It even seems to run a bit contrary to his other policies; kiwis should look to own a home to live in, motivate that by ensuring there are benefits other than just future financial to do so, while making property speculation less profitable. There's already houses not being rented out because tenants are cunts to deal with...
It also begs the question, who sets the rental prices? Presumably that is taken care of so I don't just buy the house then set a price of 10-getthefuckoutofmyhouse-thousand dollars per week.
However, he is talking policy, and the media are coving it, and I like that.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
It's already not very profitable. In the case of the one I have left, over a decade or so it's slightly worse than money in the bank.
The correct answer is the owner and the tenant. It's called a free market. Which is very approximately the opposite of what Gareth's suggesting: a local agency that sets the price of a new rental agreement based on what other local rents are.
Like I said, buy the fucking house and you can do what you like with it.![]()
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks