Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[husaberg]

I suspect it's a genetic issue in some people that results in toxin retention and the progression of those toxins into the brain.

But that's just my suspicion.

So you have no medical degree or training and no actual credble scientific link, despite you saying there was a credible scientific proven link, But what you do have is a suspicion........WOW..................

[Graystone]

I suspect it's a genetic issue in some people that results in toxin retention and the progression of those toxins into the brain.

But that's just my suspicion.

How about more doctors being able to diagnose it? Remember, things are not always as they seem at first glance!

[husaberg]

How about more doctors being able to diagnose it? Remember, things are not always as they seem at first glance!

he already denied that one, must have been due to another one of his strong suspicions.

Not these 'they' I guess...

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2927813/

but what would a peer reviewed article based on observed trends and published by a national health institute know

Clearly, there is survey/diagnosis bias; as we become more aware of the condition, it is more often checked for, and more often identified.

The condition called autism has been known for about 100 years.

The increase in numbers of diagnosed cases since the 70's is not down to an increase in 'awareness'.

It is at least partially due to that; as per the study I posted, but you cut out of the quote (you often ignore evidence like this I've noted). It was known about ages ago, but the rate of testing for it has been increasing over the years. To expect no correlation between how often it is looked for, and how often it is found, is blatant buffoonery.

Don't expect him to answer in a hurry though as hes logged in as Cassina at the moment.

[TheDemonLord]

Speaking of which.....

https://file.scirp.org/pdf/OALibJ_2018011811381800.pdf

Interesting tale....

While none of us can verify the chain of custody of the tested aliquots handled by the various laboratories and their employees, however, we hold the opinion based on data in hand, that at least half of the vaccine samples actually obtained from vials being used in the March and October rounds in 2014 tested positive for βhCG.

There's some other holes - namely that the Labs that supposedly identified the prescence of HCG don't have the equipment to make an accurate determination

And also of interest - There's some familiar names in the author list: Tomljenovic and Shaw

Remember when I mocked you that it is the same people, submitting the same sad tripe....

[Katman]

There's some other holes - namely that the Labs that supposedly identified the prescence of HCG don't have the equipment to make an accurate determination

And where exactly did you find that little gem?

And also of interest - There's some familiar names in the author list: Tomljenovic and Shaw

Well that's hardly surprising considering they run a research lab that specialises in studying neurological disorders.

[Katman]

And here's another little interesting snippet from that study I linked.

In a presentation given in 2010, Bill Gates (the man who donated 10 billion dollars towards achieving a reduction in population growth) said......

The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent∙∙∙

Now one could ask, if vaccines were all about the honourable task of saving lives, how do they fit in with an agenda to reduce population growth?

[husaberg]

And where exactly did you find that little gem?



Well that's hardly surprising considering they run a research lab that specialises in studying neurological disorders.

The lack of expertise and equipment was pointed out to you previously, the real question should be why you never realised that this was significant and completely nullified the results they claimed.

[TheDemonLord]

And where exactly did you find that little gem?

Reading critiques on the paper.

Well that's hardly surprising considering they run a research lab that specialises in studying neurological disorders.

And then why is it that there are many labs that share that same specialization, that publish good, sound research? And yet these 2 clowns consistently publish crap?

I mean - they admit they can't verify the chain of evidence - that right there should have been a show stopper. I also remember one of their papers - about the toxicity of Aluminium if memory serves was retracted - something to do with fabricating results (namely digitally editing some of the images of their results).

[TheDemonLord]

And here's another little interesting snippet from that study I linked.

In a presentation given in 2010, Bill Gates (the man who donated 10 billion dollars towards achieving a reduction in population growth) said......

Now one could ask, if vaccines were all about the honourable task of saving lives, how do they fit in with an agenda to reduce population growth?

It's really simple:

If your infant mortality rate is something like 50% - you have lots of children, to make sure that some of them survive to adulthood.
If your infant mortality rate is non-existent - you have fewer children, that you can invest more time and resources into.

[Graystone]

Now one could ask, if vaccines were all about the honourable task of saving lives, how do they fit in with an agenda to reduce population growth?

Not everything is as it seems Katman! Learn to look deeper!

Counter-intuitively perhaps, this does fit the reduction of population growth theory, lower mortality rates, longer lives, more time to put off having kids and get shit done instead. Not to mention no third child as an insurance policy...

[Katman]

Reading critiques on the paper.

Then perhaps you should read the actual study rather than relying on biased critiques of it.

The study states that while one of the six accredited laboratories had equipment that wasn't able to measure amounts down to international standards, it was still able to detect the presence of something that shouldn't have been there.

[Katman]

Not everything is as it seems Katman! Learn to look deeper!

Counter-intuitively perhaps, this does fit the reduction of population growth theory, lower mortality rates, longer lives, more time to put off having kids and get shit done instead. Not to mention no third child as an insurance policy...

Let me guess - you're another one who didn't read the study.

[husaberg]

Then perhaps you should read the actual study rather than relying on biased critiques of it.

The study states that while one of the six accredited laboratories had equipment that wasn't able to measure amounts down to international standards, it was still able to detect the presence of something that shouldn't have been there.

Now just for a laugh, why don't you separate out your opinion, from what it actually says "in the study".
I am sure a lot of people would find it interesting to see you do that.

[Katman]

Now just for a laugh, why don't you separate out your opinion, from what it actually says "in the study".
I am sure a lot of people would find it interesting to see you do that.

Why would you be more interested in my opinion of the study than the study itself?

[Graystone]

Let me guess - you're another one who didn't read the study.

Why read the study? That quote is from Bill Gates, so why not go to him for context? Dig deeper Katman, the study may not be what it seems...