The journey that COVID-19 will take us on

[mr bucketracer]

Theres more evidence in here than all the dooms day books put together !!!

[mashman]

Damn that nurse guy knows way more than he should according this no mark Aussie fella from down the pub that he's having a chat with.

[mr bucketracer]

Damn that nurse guy knows way more than he should according this no mark Aussie fella from down the pub that he's having a chat with.

glad you posted this video. Been watching Dr John from the start.

[mashman]

glad you posted this video. Been watching Dr John from the start.

Bugga about the time difference screwing the conversation, coz it looked like there were a few other things to be said along certain lines that never quite got discussed. I figured McCulloughs stuff would be a little too hard to handle v's Dr J's softly softly approach. I wonder if we'll ever see Dr J go postal, coz I suspect that that would be a spectacular thing to see given the look on his face and the fire in his eyes at times. Must be so fucking frustrating that the people are against you when the science is for you.

[mr bucketracer]

Bugga about the time difference screwing the conversation, coz it looked like there were a few other things to be said along certain lines that never quite got discussed. I figured McCulloughs stuff would be a little too hard to handle v's Dr J's softly softly approach. I wonder if we'll ever see Dr J go postal, coz I suspect that that would be a spectacular thing to see given the look on his face and the fire in his eyes at times. Must be so fucking frustrating that the people are against you when the science is for you.

agree. Looks like everyone has done a runner in here ha ha

[mashman]

agree. Looks like everyone has done a runner in here ha ha

Where is their champion?
Is there any prominent authority who is pro-vax who knows the data and is willing to defend the government narrative on tape? Who is it? All the people we've ask to debate us "on camera" turn us down.


The peer-reviewed evidence states that our current Duty of Care lies in stopping the use of the jab. Bit awkward that one eh... we know just how fiery and proud people can get when defending their Duty of Care, you know, for others.

Wonder if they'd do it again, please? Turns out we were lied to and we've done more harm than good... and continue to do so.

(much scrolling to get the sign-up box out of the way to read it through... or you can make the box, and overlay, disappear if you change the css of the elements)

[mashman]

Global excess mortality meeting the Bradford Hill criteria. NZ's Covid stats "Lamentable".

[mashman]

A Victory for Dr. Peter McCullough is a Victory For All Physicians and Patients

Took its time to get to court for some reason, hmmmmmmm. Surely it should have been easy to prove that he wasn't 'curing' people way before any talk of a vaccine. Alas, when the evidence is not in your favour, just reach for penis size and the ability to pleasure a woman to excuse that you ignored the evidence entirely and let people die needlessly. Not an easy thing to have to live with, plenty of you vaccinated people pointed that out to us unvaccinated as an outcome we were ready to wear, and we squared it away honourably. Dumb people don't know how to back down, murderers double down and keep beating a drum that is evidenced to be killing and harming people to extents that those who are looking into these thing still aren't sure as to when it'll end, or even if.... but hey, you;re fine, right?

"In a tremendous win that is truly a victory for all Americans who believe in open and honest debate and science, Dallas County Judge Tahira Khan Merritt on January 23, 2023 dismissed a Texas hospital’s lawsuit that sought to punish Dr. Peter McCullough for sharing his concerns about COVID, early treatment, and vaccine safety and efficacy.

By dismissing the suit “with prejudice,” the ruling supports the pleas of over 14,000 patients and doctors who stood with Dr. McCullough and added their names to a petition denouncing the hospital’s (Baylor, Scott, and White) attack: "

"The hospital sued Dr. McCullough for more than $1 million, reported Dallas ABC affiliate WFAA. McCullough’s attorney, Clinton Mikel told WFAA that the lawsuit is “frivolous” and a “politically motivated attempt to silence Dr. McCullough as he saves countless patient lives from Covid-19 and from ancillary actions related to Covid-19.”"

[husaberg]

A Victory for Dr. Peter McCullough is a Victory For All Physicians and Patients

Took its time to get to court for some reason, hmmmmmmm. Surely it should have been easy to prove that he wasn't 'curing' people way before any talk of a vaccine. Alas, when the evidence is not in your favour, just reach for penis size and the ability to pleasure a woman to excuse that you ignored the evidence entirely and let people die needlessly. Not an easy thing to have to live with, plenty of you vaccinated people pointed that out to us unvaccinated as an outcome we were ready to wear, and we squared it away honourably. Dumb people don't know how to back down, murderers double down and keep beating a drum that is evidenced to be killing and harming people to extents that those who are looking into these thing still aren't sure as to when it'll end, or even if.... but hey, you;re fine, right?

"In a tremendous win that is truly a victory for all Americans who believe in open and honest debate and science, Dallas County Judge Tahira Khan Merritt on January 23, 2023 dismissed a Texas hospital’s lawsuit that sought to punish Dr. Peter McCullough for sharing his concerns about COVID, early treatment, and vaccine safety and efficacy.


By dismissing the suit “with prejudice,” the ruling supports the pleas of over 14,000 patients and doctors who stood with Dr. McCullough and added their names to a petition denouncing the hospital’s (Baylor, Scott, and White) attack: "

"The hospital sued Dr. McCullough for more than $1 million, reported Dallas ABC affiliate WFAA. McCullough’s attorney, Clinton Mikel told WFAA that the lawsuit is “frivolous” and a “politically motivated attempt to silence Dr. McCullough as he saves countless patient lives from Covid-19 and from ancillary actions related to Covid-19.”"

Mashy instead of posting drivel why dont you actually read the case, it was settled it doesn't say by whom, i could just as easily mean he paid the hospital the case was about the dr representing himself to be affiliated with the hospital not with the made up shit he still posts about covid being created in a lab and of unproven cures.
https://thetexan.news/lawsuit-agains...ite-dismissed/

A lawsuit alleging that McCullough had violated a separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White has been settled and dismissed with prejudice.
A Dallas County District Court has accepted an order of nonsuit and voluntary dismissal of claims in the Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) lawsuit against Dr. Peter A. McCullough.In 2021, Baylor filed suit against McCullough alleging he had violated their separation agreement by “claiming he is affiliated” with the institution in media interviews.

The case was dismissed with prejudice on January 23. Dismissal with prejudice means no lawsuit arising from the same set of facts can be filed by the parties again.

“We take very seriously our responsibility to be a trusted source of information in the communities we serve,” a spokesperson for BSWH wrote to The Texan. “Dr. McCullough is not an employee and has agreed to not represent himself as such. As a result, both parties mutually agreed in late January to dismiss all actions.”

Voluntary dismissal of claims with prejudice are usually entered after a settlement agreement has been reached.

On January 17, the parties filed a notice of nonsuit and voluntary dismissal stating, “The [p]arties have reached a resolution to the satisfaction of both parties.”

What you are not seeing is the "dr" still claiming he was entitled to say hes afiliated with the medical institution.....hint hint hes not... which is what the case was about so how again is that a victory for the doctor ,if it was he would still be claiming to be affiliated with the hospital.
Hint hes not....
The very fact you are and the conspiracy idiots are attempting to claim this as a victory about anything else of what he said about covid clearly delusional.

[F5 Dave]

I mean, everyone thinks mashy is a moron. Do you think he is trying to portray himself like that? or is it accidental?

I'm thinking it is some sort of sexual deprivation thing where he has to humiliate himself in front of his master.

[TheDemonLord]

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr...pub6/epdf/full

Medical/surgical masks compared to no masks We included 12 trials (10 cluster-RCTs) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness (two trials with healthcare workers and 10 in the community). Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI)/COVID-19 like illness compared to not wearing masks (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.09; 9 trials, 276,917 participants; moderate-certainty evidence. Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza/SARS-CoV-2 compared to not wearing masks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 6 trials, 13,919 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported (very low-certainty evidence).

So, not only did I know more about Stats than the NZ Government, turns out I was right about Masks too.

And for all those Maskholes who implicitly or explicitly accused me of all manner of things, My good friend Razorfist expresses it best...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ta7nDCOPR7g

[mashman]

Transcript;

Dr. James Thorp: The Pushing Of The Experimental COVID Vaccines Is The Greatest Violation Of Medical Ethics In History
Posted By Tyler Stone
On Date February 24, 2023

On 'Tucker Carlson Tonight,' Dr. James Thorp spoke about the effects of the coronavirus vaccines.

"First of all, thank you very much for giving my patients a voice, my views are not shared by my employer, maybe not. Let's start out, one can make a very strong argument, Tucker, that the pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity. We have never ever broken the sacrosanct golden rule of pregnancy, never ever."

"I have published extensively in my career and extensively in the last three years all on COVID," he said. "What we have seen, this article, we are honored that I hear it is going to be a lead featured article in a major peer-reviewed medical journal, which will be published, God willing, March 1st. Let me set the scenario, what we did is we compared the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events over 18 months with that of the influenza vaccine over 282 months."

"Now Tucker, the FDA and the CDC, this is governmental data, they use a danger threshold. We did it exactly by their recommendations of two fold or greater is abnormal. What you said is true. We found a 1200 fold increase in severe menstrual abnormalities, a 57 fold increase in miscarriage, a 38 fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth rates. We found 15 other major pregnancy complications, all far exceeding the CDC and the FDA values of safety. What we have is I can produce more than 30 other completely independent sources globally that corroborate exactly our findings, Tucker. And if that is not bad enough, this includes Pfizer's own internal data," Thorp told Carlson.

----------------------------------------

Yes, it was him and Yeadon that pointed out, in a single line observation, that there was a concern with one of the ingredients in the vaccine that might muck with a ladies internals a bit. Something they were lambasted for with a barrage of sensationalist headlines of lies about what they hadn't stated. Kind of like Dave when he's on the piss. Anyhoo, it turns out that they may have had good cause for concern... which is odd given that Pfizers data stated that all was well. But hey, it's only women.

[husaberg]

Transcript;

Dr. James Thorp: The Pushing Of The Experimental COVID Vaccines Is The Greatest Violation Of Medical Ethics In History
Posted By Tyler Stone
On Date February 24, 2023

On 'Tucker Carlson Tonight,' Dr. James Thorp spoke about the effects of the coronavirus vaccines.

"First of all, thank you very much for giving my patients a voice, my views are not shared by my employer, maybe not. Let's start out, one can make a very strong argument, Tucker, that the pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity. We have never ever broken the sacrosanct golden rule of pregnancy, never ever."

"I have published extensively in my career and extensively in the last three years all on COVID," he said. "What we have seen, this article, we are honored that I hear it is going to be a lead featured article in a major peer-reviewed medical journal, which will be published, God willing, March 1st. Let me set the scenario, what we did is we compared the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events over 18 months with that of the influenza vaccine over 282 months."

"Now Tucker, the FDA and the CDC, this is governmental data, they use a danger threshold. We did it exactly by their recommendations of two fold or greater is abnormal. What you said is true. We found a 1200 fold increase in severe menstrual abnormalities, a 57 fold increase in miscarriage, a 38 fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth rates. We found 15 other major pregnancy complications, all far exceeding the CDC and the FDA values of safety. What we have is I can produce more than 30 other completely independent sources globally that corroborate exactly our findings, Tucker. And if that is not bad enough, this includes Pfizer's own internal data," Thorp told Carlson.

----------------------------------------

Yes, it was him and Yeadon that pointed out, in a single line observation, that there was a concern with one of the ingredients in the vaccine that might muck with a ladies internals a bit. Something they were lambasted for with a barrage of sensationalist headlines of lies about what they hadn't stated. Kind of like Dave when he's on the piss. Anyhoo, it turns out that they may have had good cause for concern... which is odd given that Pfizers data stated that all was well. But hey, it's only women.

your sourse
"COVID-19 vaccine adverse events over 18 months with that of the influenza vaccine over 282 months."

reality

An adverse event is any health problem that occurred after vaccination, regardless of whether the vaccine caused it. This is different from a vaccine side effect, which has been established to be caused by the vaccine

https://healthfeedback.org/claimrevi...s-epoch-times/

Conclusion
Misinformation linking COVID-19 vaccines with pregnancy and fertility problems has been pervasive throughout the pandemic. However, such claims have no fundamental basis in scientific evidence. Current evidence from research studies and vaccine safety surveillance shows that COVID-19 vaccines don’t impair fertility and are safe during pregnancy. COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing severe illness, and are particularly important for pregnant women, who are more likely to develop severe COVID-19 compared to non-pregnant women. COVID-19 also increases the risk of pregnancy complications compared to pregnant women without COVID-19. This means that getting vaccinated would reduce the risk of poor outcomes during pregnancy, not increase it.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/11/sc...of-stillbirth/

[F5 Dave]

Mashman. Dickhead.

Why do you come here? You're not a motorcyclist.

And everyone thinks you post disinformation.

[husaberg]

And everyone thinks you post disinformation.

other than his wife and son (according to him of course)
We would have a KB vote but we all know he no longer feels votes are a accurate reflection on his abilities.....