In Superintensehomo Kelly's patch, simply riding a bike is enough to warrant a Dangerous Driving charge.
In Superintensehomo Kelly's patch, simply riding a bike is enough to warrant a Dangerous Driving charge.
Just tell her that you had a massive blood flow to your privates and the wheelie was the result of this your lack control.If she don't believe you tell her that you are more than willing to give her a demonstrion of your prowess.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
The charge she is looking for is under boyracer laws
Unneccesary exhibition of speed.
It is on the impound forms etc...
If she didn't ping you at the time she can't do you with it... it's not just a fine its a impound vehicle go to court etc...
she has missed her chance.
Unnecessary exhibition cannot be charged if no other offence occurs. Since 50kph was not exceeded, and she has not gone with careleess, she can't use unnecessary exhibition.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
If you get stopped and admit to pulling a little wheelie, how would you go about proviong that it wasn't careless? ie there were no cars and clear visibility of all side roads and driveways? Surely you can't be made to pay up if the only person you could possibly hurt is yourself?? thats some bullsh*t..
It can occasionally be very difficult even for the most careful rider to prevent a slight wheel rising on a large sprots bike (or, indeed, a large chook chaser).
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
I _may_ have accidentally lifted the front wheel when I was learning. I'd forgotten to push the choke in, so my vt250 was running roughly. I was taking off uphill from the lights, and almost stalled - quickly grab the clutch and give it a rev, then quickly release the clutch so I didn't fall over ... it got a bit dramatic for a moment :-)
I assumed that since the system allows for learning on a public road (that's why I had a learner licence), some level of incompetence is expected and therefore tolerated :-)
Richard
For future reference I believe all the police cars now have a mobile number in the rear quarter window...
Basically a "ring the driver of this car on this number" - so that if the car is unattended you can call the cop who is presumable near by
You could have grabbed her number from there...
Of course if you see her in the car again somewhere...
Please help keep me in leather and on tarmac - it's good for my ego
Video Production, Corporate Video, Online Videos
To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and to endure the betrayal of false friends. To appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better whether by a healthy child, a garden patch, or a redeemed social condition; to know that even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded
Weren't there two other people riding with you who can testify that the singular or pair of officers were mistaken? I'm constantly erked at the unbalanced fact that police are believed over and above citizens/humans by default !!! WTF? It would be reasonable to doubt the officers accusations acuracy simply by countering the accusation with a denial!!! REASONABLE DOUBT ! DISMISSED!
First time Dave C rode his new SV thou with me on the back, we wheelied right through an intersection (taking off from a standing start, slightly uphill, inexperienced pillion, etc).
That was a few years ago now. Just recently he told me he thought "that's it - she'll never get on the back again!" Then realised I was laughing like a lunatic.
Now I think about it, that event was the inspiration for my username...
There is no such thing as bad weather; only inappropriate clothing!
Eggs Zachary!
When I had the FahrtSturm, I remember a couple of rides where I had the vifferbabe on the back, and accidentally wheelied the thing. One of those occasions was like the one klingon mentioned - and I had a lot of trouble trying to keep the front end down doing a hillstart at traffic lights on an uphill slope.
It's actually quite reasonable from a legal point of view: in cases like traffic offenses (sorry - "alleged" traffic offenses), the police are deemed to have no personal interest in the case, and therefore no reason to lie. OTOH, the defendant has every reason to be dishonest.
Unfortunately, (over)zealousness or ticket quotas to meet could actually mean that in certain circumstances the veracity of an officer could be in question, but even the evidence of other witnesses may not be enough, unless there is corroborating evidence.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
This lovely policewoman is going out with my cousin, who is also a cop, ex motorways now serious crash. So she is taken!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks