It ain't rocket science...
The Police have been rather mindlessly enforcing speed limits for a number of years now under successive governments. Many consider it a tax grab. I don't like it, many other members of the public don't like it, and there are members of the Police who don't like it. But it would be a very dim bulb who did not realise that this is now how the game is played.
As to experts, a Police Sergeant who was at the time on traffic duties, so I will consider him an "expert", pointed out on KB that it is not the law that gives you 200m to slow down inside a speed limit sign, it's just something the Police observe. He also pointed out that there is absolutely no leeway when leaving a restricted area. The limit remains in force until you reach the derestriction sign. None of which should really confuse any normal person.
It's just a wild guess, but I'd have thought a WoF legally expired on the date written on it. There may be another "convention" - or there may not. Expert advice could be useful here. Patrick? SD?
Again, I'll be interested to hear what happens about the WoF charge since the new cameras are reported to have resulted in four million in lost revenue. The Infringement Bureau were not in given to great generosity of spirit prior to "losing" that money so they may be even more reluctant to waive potential income now.
And no, I never did get many warnings...
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Bookmarks